Skip to main content


Most uncomplicated Printer that just works™?


Hey, sorry if this isn't the right place to ask this (feel free to show me the way). I want to get myself a printer that can also scan. Main purpose is to not have endless sheets of paper laying around, but to scan Documents I recieve and then throwing them away so that I only have them digitally and can print stuff out only when I need them.
Now I know that printers are the worst piece of hardware known to man and my needs not office-level.It doesn't have to have any more buttons or features than are needed to scan a doublesided document and print them, without clogging/eating paper, and print black and white text without complaining about being low on yellow ink.

So my question generally is: what is the most minimalist, non-bullshit printer/scanner that I could get?
But since all my devices run Linux I figured I'd just ask this here. Are there any big issues I have to look out for? Brands to avoid? (i.e nvidia being a no go for a lot of linux users) Preferably

in reply to Cinnamon3431

preferably not too expensive (just a minimalist small printer/scanner that just works)
in reply to Cinnamon3431

I've had fantastic luck with a Brother MFC b&w laser. Aftermarket toner cartridges are $20 and last a ridiculously long time. The wifi is jank so I'd recommend keeping it connected to your computer via USB, but I was able to get it running on a CUPS server via a Pi easily enough, and brother does make Linux drivers available.
in reply to empireOfLove

I have a Brother MFC Color Laser and everything here is true for the color version as well. I haven't had too many issues with wifi jank after I set a static ip both on the router side and the printer side, and then map the printer by ip port on the computer. However, it still acts up every now and then. I plan on fishing some ethernet to that corner of the office, but haven't gotten around to it yet.
in reply to wjs018

My wifi jank was less related to routing as much as it would just... forget how to send data. Especially when scanning. I think it was a controller issue so YMMV depending on which model. USB is still vastly more reliable.
in reply to Cinnamon3431

Personally I'd keep them separate unless space is an issue.

For a scanner I like my Cannon LiDE 110 It just works with simplescan. For printers, any laser that supports PCL or Postscript should be fine. I'd recommend Lexmark or Brother. For black-only, I like my Lexmark B3340. I have a couple of older HP color lasers but honestly don't really use them except for printing trail maps every now and then. For color pictures (and the maps) I now use a Canon Selphy CP1300.

This entry was edited (1 year ago)
in reply to Cinnamon3431

As others have said, Brother laser printers are great. I've had mine for ~10 years, it works better on Linux than it does on Windows, and the toner cartridges last an absurdly long time. I don't print heavily but I think I'm only on my third toner cartridge since I bought the thing.
in reply to _haha_oh_wow_

The Brother printer I bought recently was easier to install on Linux than on Mac. I think that says something. Always works too
in reply to _haha_oh_wow_

I've also never had any issues with my laser Brother printer.
in reply to _haha_oh_wow_

Agreed, Brother!

I got a Brother MFC-L2750DW and networked setup was so simple. My every device I own detected it including my phone.

Note I haven’t tried connecting it via USB, just network.

in reply to Cinnamon3431

HP Laserjet is the best and simplest printer I've owned.

don't like this

in reply to jerry

Brother is pretty analogous and you can refill the toner cartridges!
in reply to Cinnamon3431

Brother laser AIO, Just works, and if you don't really print that much, the starter toner feels like it'll last forever.
in reply to Cinnamon3431

If you want a simple colour printer and scanner, go for a Canon Megatank or Epson Ecotank. Unless you're only printing black and white, a Brother laser printer is good, but expensive. The toner isn't cheap either, in theory tho, they can last much longer without needing to print. The tank printers have far cheaper ink. Only downside is that it requires printing once a week to ensure that nothing clogs up

Cinnamon3431 doesn't like this.

in reply to Arcturus

I will also add, the new Brother laser toners, can be a bit iffy with their chip. They're not as easy to refill as the used to be, not impossible, but it's not as easy.
in reply to Cinnamon3431

This entry was edited (1 year ago)
in reply to waigl

The one thing I can't seem to get CUPS to do is share my printer with the LAN. I had it for a while where it would show up on the Macs, but then would vanish. It's my only gripe.
in reply to Cinnamon3431

All-time classic Verge article on this subject:

theverge.com/23642073/best-pri…

in reply to Ertebolle

I have a slightly different version of this printer (HL-L2350DW) and can confirm that it just does what it is supposed to do without any issues. It pretty much worked out of the box with all devices in my household and after about two years I am still on the toner cartridge it came with.
in reply to Ertebolle

And here’s 275 words about printers I asked ChatGPT to write so this post ranks in search because Google thinks you have to pad out articles in order to demonstrate “authority,” but I am telling you to just buy whatever Brother laser printer is on sale and never think about printers again.


Lmfao

in reply to anon

I have one and I forgot when I got it, it's just that old and it has never failed me
in reply to Cinnamon3431

I've had my MX490 for 2 years and i think it works pretty well. Generally speaking, the CUPS setup is far easier with Airprint printers so if you're interested in that I'd pick up a printer that supports AirPrint. Arch wiki has more info on set up it needed
in reply to Cinnamon3431

I've used a Brother business AIO Inkjet for some years without any problems.
in reply to Cinnamon3431

I got two Brother laser AIOs (MFC1910W) for my folks and myself.
All I had to do on Arch was install brother-mfc-1910w for printing, brscan4 for scanning and oh-brother for (occasionally) upgrading the firmware, all over WiFi.
I think more user-friendly distros come with these packages preinstalled, so it should just be a matter of opening the printer manager and waiting for it to show up.
Don't think they make the specific model anymore, but any Brother laser AIO should do.
in reply to feral_hedgehog

When I used Ubuntu, I had to install the .debs off of Brother's site by myself. They provide .deb/.rpm packages.
in reply to Cinnamon3431

I am happy with my Epson consumer device, it works out of the box.
in reply to Cinnamon3431

I like my Ender3 V2.

don't like this

in reply to Cinnamon3431

Probably a good old fashioned printing press. Unfortunately, I don't think they're compatible with Linux.

don't like this

Unknown parent

poquito_cabeza
+1 on Brother, plus the generic toner is dirt cheap.
in reply to Cinnamon3431

I know this isn't what you asked but just have the documents sent to you electronically and cut out the middleman while saving some trees! You can also send them electronically if required. Paper is so 1980's.

Piranha Phish doesn't like this.

in reply to tla

Thanks for the tip! I'll make sure to do this where possible :)

tla doesn't like this.

Unknown parent

DarkUFO
What's the make/model?

15stax doesn't like this.

in reply to DarkUFO

I use the hl2340d that has held up really well. Think I've had it like 6 years now
in reply to byrona

I've also used their MFC printers and they were pretty awesome
in reply to Cinnamon3431

HP is a awful company with a well deserved terrible reputation, but their linux support is great. I have a combo printer/scanner that works without a single issue.

All you gotta do is install..hplip i think it is? and plug the printer in.

This entry was edited (1 year ago)
in reply to ikidd

Absolutely!

Not a multi function device, but a plain printer, but I have a Borther HL-2365DW connected via 2.4 GHz WiFi and that is detected as HL-L2360D. The printer works absolutely fine. It still has the original toner cartridge and it is used 3-5 times a year without any issues.

Before that I had a HL-2030 that died after ~14 years.

in reply to 𝘋𝘪𝘳𝘬

To be fair, I have a 4P that I still use. But yah, my Brothers have always lasted a long time and toner/ink isn't crazy expensive. And they don't pull DRM shit like HP and get their peepees slapped time after time.
in reply to Cinnamon3431

I'm happy with my Epson ET-2820. It is a wireless inkjet printer, but it uses ink from bottles what is not that expensive. The printer hasn't dried up, yet.

The device works with the generic CUPS "driverless" printer driver, so no configuration on Linux computers to print. Scanning worked out of the box, too with sane.

tl;dr: most flawless working printer I ever owned.

in reply to Cinnamon3431

Our Samsung color laser AIO was getting flaky, especially for net access. I replaced it with an Epson EcoTank AIO and it's been absolutely hassle-free.

I was apprehensive at first, because using inkjet printers back in the 90s was just painful. But so far, never had clogging and hardly ever had a paper jam. I'd say the running costs are comparable or lower than laser.

Color laser printers always run out of yellow because they inline a yellow fingerprint. AFAIK this isn't the case with inkjets. So savings and additional privacy there.

in reply to datendefekt

Part of my job is working on printers and a word of warning, Eco tanks have a pretty common clogging issue if you're not printing regularly. Usually a few cleanings will take care of it or a power cleaning if they don't, but it's still something to be aware of.
This entry was edited (1 year ago)
in reply to Cinnamon3431

I recently ordered a Brother printer, and it just works. "Brother MFCL3730CDNRF1" At one point it was a bit tricky to add it to Cups, but after it, it worked flawless.

StarkillerX42 doesn't like this.

in reply to Cinnamon3431

My Brother HL 230 laser printer is so reliable. Had it for years and it never failed me.
in reply to Cinnamon3431

A Brother laser. If buying today, I would get a document feeder, duplexing, and wireless. The $150ish version is fine for home use. Mine lacks wireless so we use special software to add it that adds a step. But it just works and only needs a new toner ever couple years at our printing pace.
in reply to Cinnamon3431

BROTHER LASER PRINTER with a scanner combo. Literally don't bother with anything else.

/Thread

in reply to Cinnamon3431

Everyone is saying Brother, and I'll echo that. I want to add that I'm fond of their EcoTank line; there're all-in-one scanner/printers, but also they refill with liquid ink (as opposed to cartridges) and are super cost-effective as a result. I really like our's, and we've had it for two years; the next time I run out of ink on the Canon inkjet we (also) have, I'm just going to replace it with another EcoTank instead of buying more cartidges.

SirQuacksALot doesn't like this.

in reply to 𝕽𝖚𝖆𝖎𝖉𝖍𝖗𝖎𝖌𝖍

EcoTank is Epson, and Canon also has a similar MegaTank line. Unfortunately Brother has no tank-based printer (that I'm aware of).
in reply to Arcturus

Oh! Shit, you're right! Sorry.

That said, it worked OOTB with our Linux machines, incl scanning.

SirQuacksALot doesn't like this.

in reply to Cinnamon3431

I’ll be sticking with my HP Color LaserJet for now. I’ve updated it to the latest firmware before they introduced Instant Ink (and toner, I guess) and will keep it until either it or I can’t be repaired and die.

After that, I don’t know, Brother?

in reply to Cinnamon3431

Most uncomplicated Printer that just works™?
@Cinnamon3431
Brother MFC machines are what I've always used without issue in linux. Brother offers linux drivers for both print and scan on their site and they're fairly simple to install.
@Linux

Linux reshared this.