-----BEGIN PUBLIC KEY-----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-----END PUBLIC KEY-----
2025-01-02T10:49:08+00:00
- About:
Just a random internet user. Sometimes I write blog posts or work on projects I might share here. Was previously nate0@nerdica.net but it ran into a few issues and has been having some downtime lately so I might hang out here for a while.
I'm also on Nostr, searching nate@nate.mecca1.net should pull up my account in a Nostr client or Activity Pub server. If that fails, assuming your instance doesn't block the bridge, you can also try the bridge username below.
- Uid
-
dbc8dc44-1866-c3e6-a62a-122570900285
- Nickname
-
nate
- Full_name
-
Nate
- Searchable
-
false
- First_name
-
Nate
- Family_name
-
- Url
-
https://social.trom.tf/
- Photo
-
- Photo_medium
-
- Photo_small
-
sabreW4K3
in reply to Nate • • •like this
TheImpressiveX, Rose Thorne(She/Her), Themadbeagle, wizardbeard, HuntressHimbo, Blaze (he/him), TurtleTourParty, southsamurai, SendPicsofSandwiches, lurklurk, wingsfortheirsmiles, kittenzrulz123, MouldyCat, ns1, OptimusPrimeDownfall, blue lion, Binette and Sunshine (she/her) like this.
Nima doesn't like this.
Nate
in reply to sabreW4K3 • •ns1 likes this.
Fediverse memes reshared this.
Themadbeagle
in reply to Nate • • •like this
Rose Thorne(She/Her), wizardbeard, Blaze (he/him), á´á´á´á´Ęá´Ę ĺ¸, Sneezycat, lurklurk, Nate, The_Terrible_Humbaba, kittenzrulz123, MouldyCat, ns1 and Binette like this.
Nima doesn't like this.
Gutek8134
in reply to Themadbeagle • • •like this
Rose Thorne(She/Her), wizardbeard, Firebirdie713, mosiacmango, kittenzrulz123, ns1, Issytia and blue lion like this.
Nima doesn't like this.
mosiacmango
in reply to Themadbeagle • • •Nate
in reply to Themadbeagle • •I get what you're saying, and don't get me wrong I've experienced firsthand the jank of multiple interacting protocols (and differing implementations of the same one), but I think the single standardized protocol ship sailed when ActivityPub came around during OStatus's reign. A lot of software decided to support both (and many still do), and while I wasn't a part of the ecosystem then, I'm guessing users of both protocols benefited a lot from being interconnected instead of siloed.
We've currently got three big protocols - AT at tens of millions, ActivityPub and Nostr at millions - in addition to a half dozen smaller protocols with thousands of users. My personal take is that a continued ability to interact with almost everybody on all of them is a net positive rather than try to silo everybody and force a winner.
Especially because, unless Meta gets their federation act together, AT (BlueSky) is shaping up to be the big protocol. They've made some big strides towards decentralization in the last year or so, but even in a perfect implementation it'd still be fairly ce
... show moreI get what you're saying, and don't get me wrong I've experienced firsthand the jank of multiple interacting protocols (and differing implementations of the same one), but I think the single standardized protocol ship sailed when ActivityPub came around during OStatus's reign. A lot of software decided to support both (and many still do), and while I wasn't a part of the ecosystem then, I'm guessing users of both protocols benefited a lot from being interconnected instead of siloed.
We've currently got three big protocols - AT at tens of millions, ActivityPub and Nostr at millions - in addition to a half dozen smaller protocols with thousands of users. My personal take is that a continued ability to interact with almost everybody on all of them is a net positive rather than try to silo everybody and force a winner.
Especially because, unless Meta gets their federation act together, AT (BlueSky) is shaping up to be the big protocol. They've made some big strides towards decentralization in the last year or so, but even in a perfect implementation it'd still be fairly centralized compared to the other big two.
like this
ns1 and blue lion like this.
Fediverse memes reshared this.
nutomic
in reply to Nate • • •like this
underscores, blue lion and Nate like this.
corsicanguppy
in reply to Nate • • •\facepalm
like this
Rose Thorne(She/Her), Nate, lurklurk and MouldyCat like this.
don't like this
idegenszavak and Rose Thorne(She/Her) don't like this.
Cris
in reply to Nate • • •I mean, sure. In theory. But I can't really interact with people between platforms very well. If someone and I are both bridged, and I boost something on mastodon, they're not gonna see it
I'm not actually even sure if I can reply to their bridged account from my mastodon account and have their bluesky account see my reply.
Its a jank and hacky workaround for the fact that bluesky wasn't designed for interoperability with the Fediverse. I love that accounts can be bridged! But like, that's not the same as literally any other inter-platform interaction within the Fediverse. Its a tack on half-solution.
I'm happy we have it, but it's not fair to act like it's the same thing, and I can understand why people would find it frustrating.
like this
kittenzrulz123, MouldyCat, ns1, Hazzard, OptimusPrimeDownfall and blue lion like this.