Skip to main content


Raw numbers are perhaps not enough to get across just how bad the centralisation of the Fediverse by mastodon.social is. I've done a chart to show this visually, hopefully this will make the situation clearer?

Given the circumstances, getting people to join *any* other server except mastodon.social would greatly help decentralise the Fediverse. It's no longer big vs medium vs small, it's more like supergiant deathstar mastodon.social vs everyone else 😞

#Mastodon #Fediverse #MastodonSocial

in reply to Fedi.Garden ☃️

Hi there - I’ve just joined the Mastodon team full time, and part of my role is working on mastodon.social and mastodon.online. I’m just getting started and still in learning mode, but I want to say that I’m aware of this issue and the team is actively discussing how we can evolve in a way that both delivers on #Mastodon’s promise of decentralization, and provides a “safe landing place” for new users. I’m grateful for all the ideas and writing you’ve shared. I’m listening, and thank you.

mkj reshared this.

in reply to hannah aubry

@haubles this is so wonderful to hear! Good luck in your new position.

Hearing this I'm hopeful the issue of balancing on-boarding experience against encouraging new folks to join other instances is going to get handled in a thoughtful way, just as the quote-toots were. This is all very exciting!

@FediGarden

in reply to Michał "rysiek" Woźniak · 🇺🇦

@rysiek
Thank you 😊 We are working very hard to make sure everything we do evolves in a thoughtful way, and in a way that protects and reflects the needs our community.
in reply to hannah aubry

@haubles

Hi Hannah,

Thank you for taking the time to reply about this 🙏

If it's any help for the discussions within Mastodon, Nextcloud solved this issue by drawing up a pool of reliable instances with good track records, then recommending one from the pool on a rotating basis.

Because they only recommended one at a time it avoided the "paralysis of choice", but as it was rotated it spread the growth, and because the pool was all reliable instances it maintained a level of quality.

in reply to Fedi.Garden ☃️

of course! 💞

That’s one solution we’re discussing. And we’re looking at it from the account migration perspective too. We know it needs to be easier to switch instances. The technical solutions will take time, but there are things we will start doing immediately to try and help this in the meantime, too - things like doing more education about the existence of other servers, improving tutorials about how account migration works now, revisiting the server covenant, etc. Are there any other non-technical things we should start doing immediately, while the technical changes are in progress?

in reply to hannah aubry

@haubles Hi there, everything is technical, but a guided wizard to choose an instance according to theme, size, location, etc would help a lot. I'm sure I'm not the one to first say this so I apologize beforehand!
in reply to hannah aubry

@haubles

Yeah, there are many different aspects to this, definitely!

Switching the "Join mastodon.social" buttons to instead recommend a different server from a pool would be the quickest and easiest first step. It wouldn't need technical changes, it could be manually edited, and recommended server changed manually monthly or whatever? (Obviously you would need to check first with server admins that they are okay being in recommended pool 🙂 )

1/2

in reply to Fedi.Garden ☃️

@haubles

About helping people move, if you find any of the text on my site at fedi.tips useful it is available for anyone to use and build upon under CC-By-SA 4.0

I know my site's appearance has a slightly more janky homemade feel which may not fit in with your site's slicker appearance, but perhaps some of the text might be useful?

My transfer guide is at fedi.tips/transferring-your-ma… for example.

Whatever you decide, thank you for communicating, it's greatly appreciated!

2/2

in reply to Fedi.Garden ☃️

That is really kind, thank you. I love your site and all the work you do. It may not be everyone’s taste, but personally I adore your sites’ styling. Long-time admirer here 🤗 you helped me get my feet underneath me on the #fediverse, and now it’s become my career. Thank you.
in reply to hannah aubry

@haubles
I love fedi.tips's language.Its simplicity amazes me and at the same time so helpful!
in reply to hannah aubry

@haubles I just had an idea that is technical but Lower lift:
Allowing a server to pick a recommended server.
When server A closes their registration, the sign up page can say "Sorry, we're closed for registration. Please wait or consider signing up at <example.com>"
That way, someone new to the fediverse, trying to sign up isn't immediately hit with a dead end
in reply to hannah aubry

@haubles One important function to make it easy for people to move from one instance to another would be the import of the exported posts. Some fediverse SW like Sharkey and GTS offer this functionality.
in reply to 「 ⁂ Jürgen ⁂ 」

@juergen @haubles I have also thought about that as well, migration would be so much better if we could bring our posts over. This is not my primary account, I'm using it currently as my main instance is down for some reason, and this is not the first time that tweesecake.social has had a frying, and I am considering migrating if another one of these random outages happens. If that is the case, this account will be my primary, but it will mean that the posts won't be brought over, oh well, hopefully one day that could be sorted.
in reply to Alex Chapman

@alexchapman @juergen yeah, it’s not an ideal experience. It’s a tough problem to fix, but I know our team has the smarts and passion to solve it.

I migrated from Fosstodon a while back - I’m lucky it’s a reliable server. Sometimes I go back and visit my old posts, like hanging out with old friends 😁

in reply to hannah aubry

@haubles @alexchapman @juergen I know the migration of posts is hard but thats the last thing that is really missing in the migration process. The rest is already very good. Maybe the mastodon server software could import/export post archives with lower cpu priority in reverse chronological order? Old posts are not something we need to see quickly, usually, so these could be importzd slowly if that helps server hardware.
in reply to hannah aubry

@haubles why not curate a few associated instances with verified good behaviour, and also donate them some money to cover their infra costs?
in reply to hannah aubry

i hope that anyone will make migration easier and also, make it exports everything, just dont ignore followed hash in export processs would be great
This entry was edited (1 month ago)
in reply to hannah aubry

@haubles
May I suggest checking out how choosing an instance works on PieFed, another platform in the Fediverse. You click "register" on any instance and it gives you a couple alternatives to choose from beside the one you're currently browsing, presented as equals. There is a system for determining which instances are safe to show on that list.

The PieFed developers are sure to engage in a fruitful conversation about how this works on their zulip chat, chat.piefed.social .

in reply to hannah aubry

the easiest temporary solution is to make mastodon.online the default server to join and maybe actually close regs on mastodon.social until you have figuref it out.

(I'm glad you are discussing it though)

@FediGarden

This entry was edited (1 month ago)
in reply to hannah aubry

@haubles
Thought about this yesterday and dropped few points, hope they can be helpful somehow... mastodon.online/@koteisaev/115…


@FediTips
Thanks! I already voted to these issues.

The most difficult thing is to form and maintain a high-quality list of these instances to select/rotate from.
Criteria I think about:
1. Signed same moderation covenant, to be sure these recommended servers have compatible moderation policies
2. Operate e. g. at least 3 months
3. Accept new members (for this flow - without pre-moderation?!)
4. Operator gave consent to be added to this list.

Rotation can be as "instance of the week"?

@sam


in reply to Fedi.Garden ☃️

p.s. For anyone wondering why this centralisation is a problem, here's an in-depth look at why mastodon.social's increasing percentage of the Fediverse is dangerous: fedi.tips/its-a-really-bad-ide…

p.p.s. I'm not saying join any random server! I run a website at fedi.garden to recommend good alternative servers. My point was just that in terms of size, no other server is anywhere near as large as mastodon.social.

This entry was edited (1 month ago)

reshared this

in reply to Fedi.Garden ☃️

p.p.s. If anyone currently on mastodon.social wants help moving to a different server, there's an easy-to-understand step-by-step guide at fedi.tips/transferring-your-ma…

Let me know if you have any difficulties with any particular step 🙂

This entry was edited (1 month ago)

Jure Repinc reshared this.

in reply to Fedi.Garden ☃️

p.p.p.s. Looks like Mastodon gGmbH are now discussing this issue, really good to hear them being proactive! 👍

Let's give the new leadership a chance and see what they come up with 🙂

hachyderm.io/@haubles/11558779…


Hi there - I’ve just joined the Mastodon team full time, and part of my role is working on mastodon.social and mastodon.online. I’m just getting started and still in learning mode, but I want to say that I’m aware of this issue and the team is actively discussing how we can evolve in a way that both delivers on #Mastodon’s promise of decentralization, and provides a “safe landing place” for new users. I’m grateful for all the ideas and writing you’ve shared. I’m listening, and thank you.

reshared this

in reply to Fedi.Garden ☃️

FWIW I built a tool to help you see how distributed your own personal network is: moderation-explorer.online/
in reply to Fedi.Garden ☃️

I think one of the main problems is you can't transfer your posts to a new account. But I heard that @jonny was maybe working on finding a fix for this! So, one can hope that if this gets fixed it will be much easier for people to move out of mastodon.social.

PS: thank you for all your great guides :)

in reply to El Duvelle

@elduvelle

If you follow the guide, your old posts will remain in existence and help redirect people to your new account 🙂

in reply to Fedi.Garden ☃️

@elduvelle

I recently did a poll, and nearly half of all people who voted said that it bothered them that their posts didn't migrate with their accounts.

I have to admit, I was quite surprised.

in reply to El Duvelle

@elduvelle
That it wasn't less.

I mean, for me #Mastodon is #microblogging first and foremost. And in microblogging, posts are ephemeral and soon forgotten. Personally, I don't really _care_ what I posted a year ago - unless I bookmarked it. And even then, the old posts arent even _gone_ unless the old instance closes down.

But evidently, a very large number of Mastodon users feel very differently about this.

mementomori.social/@juergen_hu…

in reply to Jürgen Hubert

@juergen_hubert
I see! Indeed I am more on the side of "permanent repository of my thoughts", I often search my old posts for some link, poll or info that I know exists in the past. I wouldn't want to migrate instances if it meant loosing my post history. I'd rather loose my follows / followers - you can always find then back - than my posts.

I guess I probably also have some trauma from when I had to leave twitter to join mastodon and had to say bye-bye to all my precious tweets.. Not ready for that to ever happen again!

in reply to El Duvelle

i've moved and deleted thousands of old posts. it doesn't bother me, i think like juergen. but also, i never quote post, and don't see the point: just reply to the person

but i appreciate some people want to keep their posts forever, and like quote posts. it's not like someone else having another option hurts me in any way

but moving posts is *hard*

if you reply to 1,000 comments on 500 servers, then move, every database on every server needs an extensive update

This entry was edited (1 month ago)
in reply to Fedi.Garden ☃️

oof, I mean. I'd be down for moving, but it is quite a few steps, and lots of little ways to mess it up. I can see why people don't want to bother.
in reply to Aaron In Minnesota

@aeischeid I moved from cloud a month or two ago and it was a lot easier than I thought it was going to be.
in reply to Fedi.Garden ☃️

Do you plan to update the feditips article, section "just recommend one good server", now that mas.to is invite only? 🤔

@FediTips

This entry was edited (1 month ago)
in reply to Sci-Fi Girl

@5ciFiGirl

Thanks, didn't notice that! I've put ohai.social on there instead as it's also a good general server with lots of connections to the Fediverse.

Unknown parent

mastodon - Link to source
hannah aubry
@Rowan I really like that phrasing. The words we use matter so much :) noted, and thank you
Unknown parent

mastodon - Link to source
Mastodon Migration

@Rowan @haubles

Think it has merit. Another way to think about this concept would be to take a page from role playing computer games. When you start you arrive on "newbie island" when you walk through a few simple tasks that familiarize you with the UI and your various server options. But pretty soon you have to (get to!) move off into the real game equipt with some knowledge, the choices you've made, and a modicum of skill.

Unknown parent

Sensitive content

Unknown parent

mastodon - Link to source
Fedi.Garden ☃️

@Rowan @haubles

I don't think throwing people off a server when they've done nothing wrong is a good idea?

It would be easier to just add tutorial features to the software itself so that they are available to new people on any server.

in reply to hannah aubry

@haubles @Rowan

Just to push back against this concept of a "starter server" or "launching place", that doesn't really exist. There are just well-run servers and badly-run servers.

There's nothing easier or safer or tutorial-like about using mastodon.social than other reputable servers, and if there was it would simply encourage even more people to join mastodon.social and stay there 😦

in reply to Fedi.Garden ☃️

Sensitive content

Unknown parent

mastodon - Link to source
hannah aubry
@luca
Hey - thanks for messaging me about this and I'm sorry for the delay in getting you added to the Server Directory. We're working through a backlog of applications to the directory now. And simultaneously, we're revisiting how the Server Directory works to make it much easier and faster for servers to be added. I know this isn't a very concrete answer, but I can promise we'll have more to share soon.
in reply to Fedi.Garden ☃️

I feel like this is really easily solvable by just having the apps randomly cycle which server is selected by "default" when people are signing up. Obviously still give the option for people to manually select their preferred network, but by having the default random.

Just limit the random server selection to something like 10-20 reputable instances that have a track record of quality administration. That would avoid sending people to an instance that is unsupported and at a higher risk of shutting down.

in reply to Marc Thomas

@mthx

Yup, that's what a number of people have been saying, and it's what e.g. @nextcloud does on their Nextcloud instance picker.

Get a pool of reliable servers with a good long track record, recommend them in rotation instead of recommending mastodon.social.

reshared this

in reply to Fedi.Garden ☃️

oh that's a good call about implementing this as an app feature

that provides a way to make it happen without the cooperation of the company

in reply to Irenes (many)

(we would say "the non-profit" but they're not, right at this moment, and we're unsure how strongly we should be assuming good intentions here...........)
in reply to Making Up Rowan 🏳️‍⚧️👩

@Rowan @haubles it doesn't need to be a hard requirement but can be a nudge, like a recurring pop-up or alert reminding people that the beauty of the fediverse is its decentralization, and to consider venturing out into the network and explore a community beyond the default (with the tutorials attached)
in reply to Nathalie Van Raemdonck

in reply to Jon

@jdp23 @haubles @Rowan great thoughts as always Jon :)
There's been several studies to understand user migration into the fediverse and I feel like there was one where users were asked what determined their choice of server, and what were elements in their migration to different instances but I need to dive back into the literature to find it. I think it's important to build on such insights, as people's drives and stumbling blocks to finding "community" can vastly differ
in reply to hannah aubry

Hi! Is it still the case that only instances running Mastodon can be listed?
in reply to ltning

@ltning @luca that’s correct, we only list Mastodon instances right now - but there’s definitely a compelling case to be made for the idea of a “fedirectory.” I wonder if something like that exists already