reshared this

in reply to Tio

Here's 2 videos I saw criticizing YouTube's decision:
youtube.com/watch?v=CaaJyRvvaq…

youtube.com/watch?v=cX62w2rb7H…

I know that the attention economy has given too much importance to these numbers, but I do think they have a point though. Usually people look at the like-dislike ratio on a video, so its similar to reddit in that way. Of course, the accuracy of this data depends on how many people have liked/disliked thr video and how the site deals with spam, which is an issue for sites like peertube.

in reply to Rokosun

Even for things like documentaries, more scientific and fact based documentaries may have a better like to dislike ratio compared to blatantly wrong conspiracy ones.

And often times, the like/dislike ratio tells us more about the users of a platform than the quality of the content. For example, Peertube may have more engagement in tech videos because its built around that community. On that note, Without this info, how can I recognize if a video is underrated or not ?

in reply to Tio

I've been doing the same thing for years, I never really looked at any of these numbers and have been just consuming the content YouTube recommends me, that was the only thing I used my account for, lol. This was before I got into privacy/FOSS, now I don't even use my google account :)

But just because I don't personally use this feature, doesn't mean its useless for everyone. For me its kind of a habit, I never really take a moment to look at these numbers, haha 😁

in reply to Tio

Yes, I am all for critisism. But its not always possible for everyone to go around and criticise everything they disagree with, most people won't even have the time. For example, if I saw an antivax video on peertube, its much easier for me to dislike the video instead of commenting below trying to explain why they're wrong. There's already so many online content explaining vaccines, so I don't wanna waste my time arguing with someone over this. Disliking is a passive way of disagreeing :)
in reply to Rokosun

When you initially decided to remove the like/dislike counts, you said the same thing and I was supportive of it. This new decision from youtube and these videos are making me rethink about this thing. I remember someone from our matrix chat saying that he uses the dislike button. He said basically what I said above, he just don't wanna spent his time criticizing every video he dislikes, that's cumbersome :)
in reply to Rokosun

Yes, I am all for critisism. But its not always possible for everyone to go around and criticise everything they disagree with, most people won't even have the time.


Yah am not suggesting everyone who disagrees should make a video or leave a comment about that, but disliking it also makes no sense in my view.

For example, if I saw an antivax video on peertube, its much easier for me to dislike the video instead of commenting below trying to explain why they're wrong.


Yah I get you but then why not simply ignore it? Or just dislike it and the peertube system should have an algorithm so it knows what you disliked in order to not show you those kinds of videos. But having a public counter how does it help and who does it help?

in reply to Tio

> But having a public counter how does it help and who does it help?

Public counter is used to get a rough idea of the public opinion of a video. For example, if someone made a video with a misleading thumbnail, then that video would have a poor like-dislike ratio. If someone stumbles upon a nice video, how is he supposed to know that its underrated ? Without these counts, that info is hidden from them.

in reply to Rokosun

> the public opinion can be ok at times, but in todays world i feel like it does more harm than good.

I know that likes/dislikes are not a good indication for the quality of the content, they just show you what the public thinks about it. That is the information it gives you, whether you agree with the public opinion is your choice. Perhaps my second question is more important here, without this data how would you know if a video is underrated or not ?

in reply to Tio

If I watch a video and liked it very much, I'd assume its a popular video but it might be underrated, there's no way to know without the like/dislike or watch counts.

For example, take this video sasha did a while ago - videos.trom.tf/videos/watch/95…

Without any of these counts, I'd assume its a viral hit on peertube, based on just the quality of the content. But because I can see that this video only has 5 likes, I know this video is underrated and deserves more likes 😉

in reply to Tio

Underrated means a video doesn't have the popularity it deserves.

It'll help me understand the situations better, I would've wrongly believed that one video is viral just by looking at the quality.

For example, Imagine if TROM was super popular and you were getting thousands of emails a day. Would you be able to read all those messages ? Would you be able to make TROMcasts public if hundreds of people would join and overload the server ? That's quite a difference from how things are now.

in reply to Tio

As a content creator maybe you would see things differently from your perspective. Maybe it's easier for you to not care about these numbers. But not every creator would be the same though. But from a user's perspective, maybe we like to learn more about the creators we like. I gave an example of TROM to show how drastically different these things would be. For example if I'm writing an email to a creator, my message would be buried under thousands of others if the creator is super popular.
in reply to Rokosun

Also when talking about new/controversial ideas or opinions, I'd like to know how the public reacts to it. For example, I might like to know how well people receive ideas like nudism, which we did a TROMcast about. I know these wouldn't affect the quality of the content in any way, but I just like to know how well people recieve such ideas. It tells how open minded people are, and how well these videos work in changing public opinion.
in reply to Rokosun

Idk if these "advantages" outweigh the dis-advantages of such labeling systems. If you are worried that you may want to contact a creator but they are too popular, and you may not know that, this is not as relevant I think. You should try to contact them regardless. Lots of nonpopular creators don't give a shit about replying to emails, and the opposite is also true.

As for judging if some videos are well received by looking at the like/dislike counter....dik...is that relevant? Is the platform where it was posted relevant? Like if we post the video about nudity on fb/youtube vs peertube, I guess the audience is different.

Chivo doesn't like this.

in reply to Tio

Idk if these "advantages" outweigh the dis-advantages of such labeling systems.

The disadvantages lie in how people interpret this data, the data itself is not to blame. If people understand the limitations of this data, then its fine I think.

Is the platform where it was posted relevant?

This is what I said before, people's reaction changes from platform to platform. Peertube seems to be more revolved around the tech community, so we'll be getting the data from them.

in reply to Rokosun

Users should have the control, so if Peertube would allow me as user to disable/enable like/dislike buttons and view counts, then the admins should leave these options for the users. The reason I remove these from our Peertube is becuase users have no choice there. On Youtube they do have choices so I dont agree that youtube should decide for everyone and remove these options. Users should do that if they do not want to see such things on their videos or other videos.

However the dislike button makes no sense for me. It is a knee jerk reaction that tells nothing to the creator, and very little to the others.

in reply to Rokosun

The way I see it, if someone don't care about these numbers, they can just ignore it, like how I do it. But it doesn't work the other way around, if you remove the button, its gone forever. This is what youtube did.

Letting each individual choose whether they wanna hide it or not would be the best thing, maybe peertube can add that as an anti-addiction feature or something. We already have such features in many mastodon clients - github.com/tuskyapp/Tusky/issu…

in reply to Tio

Even if you're not making content for trading/profit, you should still be open to criticisms and learn from these feedbacks, right ?

I'm not a content creator but AFAIK these feedbacks are helpful in improving the quality of the content. If I write a book, I'm doing it to share my ideas, and not caring about feedbacks would affect the quality of my content and I'll get less readers. This is fine, but if you're writing about something important, you want more people to read & know about it.

in reply to Tio

> That's why I recommend to remove the dislike button so you force people to give some useful feedback. A dislike tells you nothing.

Like I said, most people don't have the time to go around and criticize everything they see. Like/dislike button being a passive way of showing support/disagreement, more people will use it and the data will be more accurate. I think both comments and the like/dislike ratio is useful for getting feedbacks, they both compliment each other.

in reply to Rokosun

I didn't say I prefer the reddit one, I said that makes more sense than the like/dislike approach. I use high rated posts from reddit for tromnews so that we do not get a thousands posts a day. And they are from specific categories like photos from nature and such. It is a way to filter out the amount of them, not necessarily the quality. And that is a measurement of how many people liked a particular reddit post, nothing to do with the dislike button.