Bitwarden is a free open source password manager for computers and mobile devices. You can follow their official accounts at:
➡️ @bitwarden@fosstodon.org (main account)
➡️ @bitwarden@tilvids.com (videos)
➡️ @Bitwarden@pixey.org (photos & clips)
Their website is at bitwarden.com
(New post due to additional official accounts)
#BitWarden #FOSS #FLOSS #Libre #FreeSoftware #OpenSource #Password #Passwords #PasswordManager #Business #Productivity #Office #Apps
Bitwarden Open Source Password Manager | Bitwarden
Bitwarden is an integrated open source password management solution for individuals, teams, and business organizationsbitwarden.com
reshared this
Tio
in reply to FediFollows has moved! • •FediFollows has moved!
in reply to Tio • • •I think the prices are for storage and support?
"Free" refers to the libre licence of the software itself, you don't have to use the developers' services at all.
Dr. Percy reshared this.
Tio
in reply to FediFollows has moved! • •So what is free then?
Then I wonder why not link to that? Also, the word "free" is so confusing here.
Dr. Percy reshared this.
FediFollows has moved!
in reply to Tio • • •There have been very, very many discussions about what the word "free" means in FOSS.
In this context, it means free as in you are allowed to download, distribute, alter the software.
The prices are for hosting and support labour, not for the software.
You don't have to use their hosting or their support if you don't want to.
Dr. Percy reshared this.
Tio
in reply to FediFollows has moved! • •smallcircles (Humane Tech Now)
in reply to Tio • • •Liwott likes this.
Tio
in reply to smallcircles (Humane Tech Now) • •As I have mentioned many times in conversations over here (the fedi) :) - saying "Bitwarden is a free open source password manager for computers and mobile devices." then link to a paid service is confusing. This is my main point.
I understand the context behind FOS, but the wording is confusing, so much so that I suspect many, including @FediFollows are confusing in this case the Bitwarden client/server software that is Open Source, with the services that they provide. Else they should have directly link to the Github page.
We have to be careful of such muddying of the software waters. Many companies do this on purpose so we must not be naive. ;)
Bitwarden
in reply to Tio • • •smallcircles (Humane Tech Now) reshared this.
Tio
in reply to Bitwarden • •Hi there. I fully understand that. It is great that you open sourced your software. However isn't your free plan freemium? Meaning, can we define it as such?
The "free" plan lacks certain features such as:
Bitwarden
in reply to Tio • • •smallcircles (Humane Tech Now) reshared this.
Tio
in reply to Bitwarden • •I do not try to say you are without reason to implement such marketing schemes, and if the money goes towards the support of the software itself then that's great. But from the official definition/understanding of the concept of freemium, Bitwarden does provide a freemium account.
Google and the like use such schemes too, and provide a limited version of their software to then gain more paid subscribers. How is Bitwarden different in that regards? I would not call Youtube, Gmail, Google Photos and the like free. They are paid services + freemium accounts + ad-based access and such. But they are clearly not free, you trade something for these services: currency, data, attention (via ads).
Rokosun likes this.
Bitwarden
in reply to Tio • • •I think that is a great question and I would say that the main difference is that Bitwarden community members are not the product, we never sell your data or serve you ads.
If you are interested, you can also check out a recent article from our CEO on this issue: bitwarden.com/blog/defining-an…
And let me know what you think.
The FOSS discussion is definitely a big one, with proponents on both sides of the equation.
Defining and sustaining value for Bitwarden users | Bitwarden Blog
bitwarden.comTio
in reply to Bitwarden • •I am reading through the article.
You are saying:
But the "free" plan only has "Bitwarden Send for direct encrypted sharing" for Text and not for files; the "Two-step Login" feature is missing options such as "YubiKey, FIDO2, Duo"; missing "Encrypted File Attachments", missing "Bitwarden Authenticator (TOTP)". So the free version is for sure not "fully featured". Am I correct to say that?
... show moreYou see after writing several books about corruption, looking at the software world too, and broken promises. After a decade of seeing endless examples of companies promising this or that, I find it so hard to believe any words coming from a company. Here's the basic why:
I am reading through the article.
You are saying:
But the "free" plan only has "Bitwarden Send for direct encrypted sharing" for Text and not for files; the "Two-step Login" feature is missing options such as "YubiKey, FIDO2, Duo"; missing "Encrypted File Attachments", missing "Bitwarden Authenticator (TOTP)". So the free version is for sure not "fully featured". Am I correct to say that?
You see after writing several books about corruption, looking at the software world too, and broken promises. After a decade of seeing endless examples of companies promising this or that, I find it so hard to believe any words coming from a company. Here's the basic why:
If I sell tomatoes, I can never afford to tell people to go to the other shop because they have better and cheaper tomatoes. I will lose customers...
In other words, you are selling Bitwarden subscriptions. You need to keep on doing that by all means, else (unfortunately) you can go bankrupt. This is an entanglement I personally cannot ignore nor should anyone else do. I have used a similar service in terms of the marketing approach: Standard Notes. They also have a strong "manifesto". And yet they started to make it harder for others to self host because they were losing money from self-hosters providing free Standard Notes services for the public.
If you made it more and more easy to self-host Bitwarden and more and more would self host and provide free (not freemium) access to the public, you are in danger of going bankrupt. And this truly sucks and I can never use words like "grow sustainably".
I truly hope you understand my points here.
like this
smallcircles (Humane Tech Now), SmoothOperatorGR, adrienandrem and EdenDestroyer (He/Him) like this.
reshared this
smallcircles (Humane Tech Now) and SmoothOperatorGR reshared this.
Bitwarden
in reply to Tio • • •Tio
in reply to Bitwarden • •So fully featured means without those features that are for the paid subscriptions... Because you are saying the features included in the "free" version are full enough for a password manager. Ok. I find the wording and the explanation very confusing. TOTP, YubiKey, FIDO2, Duo can be seen as essential for a password manager. TOTP especially.
I am also concerned that in the future you may add more features that are necessary, but only for the paid subscriptions. I've seen this before.
We all due respect, I do not trust Bitwarden and their future plans, their promises and approach. Like I do not for pretty much any company out there. I've seen this scenario play many times. It is fine, we can leave it as such and I hope you prove me wrong!
Please take my criticism as constructive. I am all for providing free access for people, for all kinds of services. We provide over 20 at trom.tf/ and we do so because of the FOSS community.
Dr. Percy reshared this.
smallcircles (Humane Tech Now)
in reply to Tio • • •I am personally not at all confused and also do not think there's muddying of the water and misleading stuff.
If I go to the website there's a Free Plan that is hosted by #Bitwarden and there's 2 direct links from the front page that lead me to their open source projects. It is very clear what is paid and what is not. Everything is very informative giving comparison of what I get, and on the Open Source page it is explained how I can self-host.
Exemplary FOSS biz
fgaz likes this.
Tio
in reply to smallcircles (Humane Tech Now) • •Tio
in reply to smallcircles (Humane Tech Now) • •smallcircles (Humane Tech Now)
in reply to Tio • • •Nope. They aren't FOSS, cannot be self-hosted, they aren't even "gratis", as they mislead you and monetize your PII behind your back for advertising and other nefarious purposes.
There are healthy FOSS models where developers erect a company and earn a living from it, right? May they not have a project/product site where they state how they sustain themselves from their work? May others not point to it saying "they are free open source, and this is their website"?
Tio
in reply to smallcircles (Humane Tech Now) • •smallcircles (Humane Tech Now)
in reply to Tio • • •No, you are twisting my sentence. The wording was "free open source", that's different than saying something is free.
I think the way the original toot was phrased was totally okay and not leading confusion.
You seem to say that as soon as the word "free" is in the text, you are only allowed to link to the GH repo.
What if repo README only held dev compile instruction, and the site offered full documents, transparency on offerings, accessible, easy-to-navigate.
Tio
in reply to smallcircles (Humane Tech Now) • •Sorry not intentionally. So "free and open source" can be paid for, and "free" can be money free. And vice versa. May not be confusing for you, but for me it is very much so, and for pretty much everyone who does not strongly grasp what FOSS is.
... show moreIf I tell people that Nextcloud is a free Google Drive alternative I'll make sure not to link to their Enterprise Business Plan. It is a nice way of keeping yourself honest and not confuse anyone. I would not direct people to MegaSync and say "Megasync is a free open source file hosting for computers and mobile devices.". Their client is Open Source and even if their server would also be, it is misleading.
Sorry not intentionally. So "free and open source" can be paid for, and "free" can be money free. And vice versa. May not be confusing for you, but for me it is very much so, and for pretty much everyone who does not strongly grasp what FOSS is.
If I tell people that Nextcloud is a free Google Drive alternative I'll make sure not to link to their Enterprise Business Plan. It is a nice way of keeping yourself honest and not confuse anyone. I would not direct people to MegaSync and say "Megasync is a free open source file hosting for computers and mobile devices.". Their client is Open Source and even if their server would also be, it is misleading.
Simple, link to the page where they provide that "free open source" part of their project. Regardless if it is on their website or github.
Rokosun likes this.
smallcircles (Humane Tech Now)
in reply to Tio • • •It is here that it becomes a bit of nitpicking and maybe we just agree to disagree
The original toot had separate parts to convey the info:
1) Bitwarden is a free open source password manager for computers and mobile devices
2) You can follow their official accounts at
3) Their website is at bitwarden.com
As a person who doesn't strongly grasp what FOSS is I would still like to start on the landing page that explains what #Bitwarden, then drill-down.
Bitwarden Open Source Password Manager | Bitwarden
bitwarden.comDr. Percy reshared this.
Tio
in reply to smallcircles (Humane Tech Now) • •I understand but them saying "Bitwarden is a free open source password manager for computers and mobile devices" they should have at least linked to that, rather than to a page where they talk about prices. We can leave it at that, but if this is confusing for me, I bet it is confusing for pretty much everyone who is not a "software nerd" and into "FOSS".
And there is no reason to make things confusing:
Bitwarden provides a client/server software that is open source, thus anyone can self-host it. Here you can read more bitwarden.com/open-source/
Bitwarden also provides freemium + paid-for services here bitwarden.com/pricing/
Done. Easy. :)
like this
smallcircles (Humane Tech Now), was B (this is my old account) and clacke: exhausted pixie dream boy 🇸🇪🇭🇰💙💛 like this.
reshared this
smallcircles (Humane Tech Now), was B (this is my old account) and Craig reshared this.
Rokosun
in reply to Tio • • •@FediFollows @humanetech @bitwarden
Tio likes this.
Rokosun
in reply to Tio • • •@FediFollows @humanetech @bitwarden
fgaz likes this.
Dr. Percy reshared this.
Rokosun
in reply to Rokosun • • •@FediFollows @humanetech @bitwarden
Tio likes this.
Tio
in reply to smallcircles (Humane Tech Now) • •When you sell your product you are entangled with your "clients".
I gave an example of Standard Notes. They open sourced their client/server yet they are selling subscriptions via their servers. They also limit, like Bitwarden, the "free" subscription. So they provide freemium accounts + paid for.
Because many started to use their software and self host + provide free (completely free not freemium) access to the public, Standard Notes made it much more difficult to self host and I had the "opportunity" to talk to them about this since we were also self hosting. And indeed they admitted the decisions were mostly for their financial gains since so many were providing Standard Notes for free, and that takes away from their profits.
That's the catch here and I am not accusing these people really. The developers need financial support indeed. But please do un
... show moreWhen you sell your product you are entangled with your "clients".
I gave an example of Standard Notes. They open sourced their client/server yet they are selling subscriptions via their servers. They also limit, like Bitwarden, the "free" subscription. So they provide freemium accounts + paid for.
Because many started to use their software and self host + provide free (completely free not freemium) access to the public, Standard Notes made it much more difficult to self host and I had the "opportunity" to talk to them about this since we were also self hosting. And indeed they admitted the decisions were mostly for their financial gains since so many were providing Standard Notes for free, and that takes away from their profits.
That's the catch here and I am not accusing these people really. The developers need financial support indeed. But please do understand that when they sell their product, even if it is FOSS, their decisions will be biased. They are under pressure.
So eventually we did not host Standard Notes anymore since it became more and more difficult to do so.
I hope you see my point.
smallcircles (Humane Tech Now)
in reply to Tio • • •I see this point, and yes there are a lot of challenges sustaining oneself from FOSS, but its a different point than what started the discussion.
Original point was you suggesting to @FediFollows to reformulate their post because of the word "free" in "free open source" would be very confusing if a website linked further on had pricing information on it. And that the right way to communicate was linking to Github instead.
Given how that website is set up, I disagree. That's all
smallcircles (Humane Tech Now)
in reply to Tio • • •I suggested #WebApe as a candidate to #delightful libre hosters, maintained by @jonatasbaldin btw..
codeberg.org/jonatasbaldin/del…
WebApe
Codeberg.orgclacke: exhausted pixie dream boy 🇸🇪🇭🇰💙💛 likes this.
Tio
in reply to smallcircles (Humane Tech Now) • •Yes thank you but I looked at it and I would not say that I provide free (libre) hosting, but the opposite: paid for. You see we may have deep disagreements as to what is "free", but for me when you trade something in order to get something else in return, it is not free. WebApe is separate from our trade-free services such as trom.tf for a reason. To not muddy the concept of free. I provide paid-for services via WebApe, non-free (trade-based), but free services (trade-free) via trom.tf. That's the difference.
Thank you for the submission tho, I appreciate it.
Rokosun likes this.
Rokosun
in reply to Tio • • •@FediFollows @humanetech @jonatasbaldin @bitwarden
Tio likes this.
Dr. Percy reshared this.
Tio
in reply to Rokosun • •It is muddying when some go in-between. And they provide some free hosting for example, but limited, and then paid for plans. So then others think that Bitwarden is free, while missing out on the fact that it is "Bitwarden minus certain features" that is "free". I am also not saying all of these people are willingly deceiving the rest, but I do say that many many companies do. They lure you in with their "free" plans, freemiums or ad based or data collection tactics, to then grab your currency too.
I remember when Google Photos offered unlimited storage, to then 2 years later stopping that and now millions of users had lots of photos stored there, so what would they do? Well pay for it to be able to keep on using that "unlimited" service. My mother was in that sort of situation and then we felt forced to pay for it eventually.
like this
Billy Smith and Rokosun like this.
Teknikal_Domain
in reply to FediFollows has moved! • • •GitHub - dani-garcia/vaultwarden: Unofficial Bitwarden compatible server written in Rust, formerly known as bitwarden_rs
GitHublike this
Tio and clacke: exhausted pixie dream boy 🇸🇪🇭🇰💙💛 like this.
FediFollows has moved!
in reply to Teknikal_Domain • • •Teknikal_Domain
in reply to FediFollows has moved! • • •Latte macchiato :blobcoffee: :ablobcat_longlong:
in reply to Teknikal_Domain • • •It also doesn't eat resources like crazy, the vanilla Bitwarden stack is a nightmare.
Vaultwarden is what you should host.
FediFollows has moved!
in reply to Latte macchiato :blobcoffee: :ablobcat_longlong: • • •Sure, but I can only highlight things on this account that have a Fedi account.
I can't post about anything that isn't on the Fedi.
Teknikal_Domain
in reply to FediFollows has moved! • • •that's why I'm here. You can't directly but we sure can chime in!
:D
Tio
in reply to FediFollows has moved! • •EdenDestroyer (He/Him) likes this.
RCC
in reply to FediFollows has moved! • • •Tio
in reply to RCC • •Mackaj
in reply to FediFollows has moved! • • •Bitwarden gets my vote. Use it at work, and at home have paid for the family plan.
Hint for use at work: For a corporation where DNS subzones denote different security zones with different passwords, set the "Default URI match detection" (in options) to be "Regular expression". Then you can assign different passwords for each zone/subzone instead of managing each unique FQDN. It's a big time saver.
Sreedev Krishnakumar
in reply to FediFollows has moved! • • •Bitwarden
in reply to Sreedev Krishnakumar • • •Thanks for the support all! Paid plans ensure Bitwarden will continue to be available for free (covering server, hosting, customer support costs).
Free accounts store an unlimited number of usernames/passwords, on an unlimited number of devices.
There are many FOSS services that also offer paid solutions.
Regarding using a Vaultwarden server, they still use official Bitwarden clients which require development and maintenance.
GNU/Matt :fedora: :kde:
in reply to Bitwarden • • •RCC
in reply to FediFollows has moved! • • •Tio
in reply to RCC • •You can't call freemiums as free. As simple as that. Freemiums are a classic example of the trade-system's merchants. Maybe Bitwarden's intentions are noble, tho even if that's the case, they limit the "free" version of Bitwarden, so that is freemium.
That's not a free plan. It is a freemium plan.
And I have nothing against Bitwarden. It is great that they open source t
... show moreYou can't call freemiums as free. As simple as that. Freemiums are a classic example of the trade-system's merchants. Maybe Bitwarden's intentions are noble, tho even if that's the case, they limit the "free" version of Bitwarden, so that is freemium.
That's not a free plan. It is a freemium plan.
And I have nothing against Bitwarden. It is great that they open source their code, however they should not lie as to what their services are. And them being a company, are entangled with their product and will, listen to me, fuck things up eventually. I am old enough to have seen this endlessly.
Think about this: If Bitwarden makes it very easy for others to self host, and more and more humans have free (proper free) access to their full Bitwarden software, then Bitwarden goes bankrupt. So Bitwarden is in a biased and sketchy situation. Not their fault really, it is this trade-based society that forces us all to trade trade trade.
Standard Notes was "free" and also paid for, and also foss. Still is. Yet there was a big scandal because after a while of playing nicely, they made it much harder for self hosters to host Standard Notes and their extensions. We had to give up hosting it for free for others, because was too difficult to fix some of the stuff they intentionally did for money reasons.
Tio
Unknown parent • •Yes unfortunately they have to charge for such services. I understand that. But making it clear what is free and what is not, should be a priority. Bitwarden provides an Open Source client/server (software). Bitwarden also provides a freemium account + paid-for accounts via their bitwarden.com business. Easy. We made it clear now.
EdenDestroyer (He/Him) likes this.
Tio
Unknown parent • •All I am doing is making people aware that when you sell something, you are extremely prone to bias, corruption, deceiving others, and so on. I have showcased in this book a plethora of examples tromsite.com/books/#flipbook-d… - and overall in our books here tromsite.com/books.
Let's take Matrix/Element for example. Matrix is the server, Element is the client (chat). matrix.org/ is the main server website. They separate the two quite a bit. I cannot see prices on the matrix website for instance. On the same website they encourage the use of any other client not just Element - matrix.org/docs/projects/try-m… . Which tells me that they are more honest and less biased towards their own client.
... show moreAll I am doing is making people aware that when you sell something, you are extremely prone to bias, corruption, deceiving others, and so on. I have showcased in this book a plethora of examples tromsite.com/books/#flipbook-d… - and overall in our books here tromsite.com/books.
Let's take Matrix/Element for example. Matrix is the server, Element is the client (chat). matrix.org/ is the main server website. They separate the two quite a bit. I cannot see prices on the matrix website for instance. On the same website they encourage the use of any other client not just Element - matrix.org/docs/projects/try-m… . Which tells me that they are more honest and less biased towards their own client.
On the Element website however (the client) element.io they provide paid for services as in "hosting and setup - services", but as far as I can tell they do not touch the software. No "minus features". This means they do not use the software as the product, but services. Much much better. Less entanglement. Actually even if you use their default app app.element.io/#/login they make it easy for you to add your own matrix server and login with that. I do not see this as an option for Bitwarden vault.bitwarden.com/#/login
Overall Matrix + Element provide open source software (server/client) and sell some services without removing features from the software itself. Thus they are prone to less bias I would argue. Maybe that's why they let you use their Client with any Server, directly from their own website. And perhaps they can do all of this because they get enough funds from all sort of sources, so they don't have to sell that much.
Tio
Unknown parent • •I never asked for such a thing. I host 20+ services via trom.tf/ and I am considering hosting Vaultwarden (a Bitwarden fork) there too, trade-free. No freemiums and such.
What I asked is for them to admin that their "free" plan is freemium, and for others who talk about such pieces of software to differentiate between the software itself that can be called "free and open source" and the services that these companies provide, that are trade-based / freemiums.
Unfortunately in this world this is the case, and I scream for more than a decade now how this is insanity. We have plenty of resources to provide for all, for free. It is an unfortunate situation but I am acutely aware of it and trying to showcase ways of doing it better via our TROM project.
Tio
Unknown parent • •Tio
Unknown parent • •Rokosun likes this.
Tio
Unknown parent • •Semantics have to do with words, but Bitwarden provides a less featured software for their "free" account. Those are not words, just facts. And we refer to this as freemium.
Google, Facebook, Microsoft and pretty much all companies use such tactics. Not accusatory in this context, but just saying it is not mere semantics, it is a marketing strategy.
EdenDestroyer (He/Him) likes this.
Tio
Unknown parent • •It is not free, it is limited in features specifically as a marketing strategy called freemium.
You might be fooled by the wording there, but that's actually the point of this strategy. Works with some people.
... show moreYes this is great, and it is different form the services that they provide. For those, they charge.
It is not free, it is limited in features specifically as a marketing strategy called freemium.
You might be fooled by the wording there, but that's actually the point of this strategy. Works with some people.
Yes this is great, and it is different form the services that they provide. For those, they charge.
And that's what I've been doing for years. We have a custom Linux distro for example and hundreds of apps in our library, and we check to see if they are truly free (trade-free) or not tromjaro.com/apps/ - we have a Trade-Free directly too where we vet these goods/services for how "free" they are.
smallcircles (Humane Tech Now)
in reply to Tio • • •Yes, the quote from the Wikipedia page. It says this is a "freemium business model". So "freemium" is the name of the business model. If you look at the diagram depicting it, it says "Free Tier" where things start. Doesn't say "Freemium Tier".
And its a free tier within this freemium model. If you are satisfied with what it offers, namely unlimited pwd storage for all your devices, then you'll never pay. If that promise is broken, then yes complain.
Tio
Unknown parent • •Tio
Unknown parent • •Not semantics, but based on what they actually do. You can't sell half-full bottles of drinks and call them full.
It is not me doing that, they provide a service that fits perfectly fine in what we describe today as freemium.
Tio
Unknown parent • •EdenDestroyer (He/Him) likes this.
Tio
in reply to smallcircles (Humane Tech Now) • •Tio
Unknown parent • •Tio
Unknown parent • •smallcircles (Humane Tech Now)
in reply to Tio • • •Tio
in reply to smallcircles (Humane Tech Now) • •Ok, I'd like to see that being said by them.
We should not use the baby brain for these. We know, of course, that this freemium business model is meant to lure in customers, deceive at times, and so forth. That's why many companies they provide "free" access, to get you to buy the "premium" ones.
Tio
in reply to smallcircles (Humane Tech Now) • •Tio
Unknown parent • •smallcircles (Humane Tech Now)
in reply to Tio • • •Agree, there's a lotta very unfortunate things in our hypercapitalist inherently unsustainable worldwide economic system.
Look, I *really* appreciate the passion and perseverance with which you advocate different, better ways to move forward.
But I think if you are honest your persistence on this thread mostly stems from your advocacy of the concept of "trade-free" versus other uses of "free" that do not match it. As an activist spreading the msg.
Tio
in reply to smallcircles (Humane Tech Now) • •My engagement and "passion" on this thread comes from years and years of seeing so many companies promising this or that, and then they are caught up in lies and deceiving tactics. And I've see them abusing the concept of free and privacy too many times. I do not want that to happen. So I react to that.
Bitwarden may be a bit of a nitpicking case, but I started by suggesting to @FediFollows that the way they wrote the post is confusing, to me and am sure to others. And to understand the misconceptions and abuse of the concept of "free" that I think Bitwarden is at least a little bit guilty of.
I am someone who tests thousands of Open Source apps for our TROMjaro distro, and I am tired of seeing so many "marketing" strategies h
... show moreMy engagement and "passion" on this thread comes from years and years of seeing so many companies promising this or that, and then they are caught up in lies and deceiving tactics. And I've see them abusing the concept of free and privacy too many times. I do not want that to happen. So I react to that.
Bitwarden may be a bit of a nitpicking case, but I started by suggesting to @FediFollows that the way they wrote the post is confusing, to me and am sure to others. And to understand the misconceptions and abuse of the concept of "free" that I think Bitwarden is at least a little bit guilty of.
I am someone who tests thousands of Open Source apps for our TROMjaro distro, and I am tired of seeing so many "marketing" strategies hidden in a sneaky way, behind many apps. At times you don't realize that you are using a freemium version of an app up until later on, and it is truly bothering. Once I have edited this big book in a PDF editor that was "free and open source" and I had installed it via the software manager, and when I wanted to save the PDF it injected a watermark on all pages asking me to pay to have that removed. I've seen this happen countless of times.
In any case, I appreciate this comment:
Being extremely passionate about something is a double edge sword, on one hand you will be very vocal and active and this is very important, on the other hand you can be biased. I try not to be biased, and if I am I hope others will expose that.
reshared this
Dr. Percy reshared this.
smallcircles (Humane Tech Now)
in reply to Tio • • •I understand and thank you for elaborating.
It is frustrating to see the shenanigans all around us. I just feel that the use of the model, doesn't necessarily guarantee its abuse. And if it is abused it is not inherent to the model, but to the flaws of the people behind it. Any form of criticism is then warranted, but based on their behavior.
Maybe Bitwarden could improve and highlight import/export, migration support from free tier to self-hosted.
Dr. Percy reshared this.
Tio
in reply to smallcircles (Humane Tech Now) • •We spent a lot of time at TROM trying to showcase how the environment is ultimately what makes humans be like this or like that. It is a fact, and it is important to embrace it. Else we end up blaming people and never changing the environment, and thus the same environment will create the same kind of people.
In other words, if you live in an environment that is competitive, you'll be competitive, and perhaps egocentric, and greedy.
In any case, I always try to never blame people, but to look at how the env is shaping their behavior. The people behind Bitwarden should understand that I do not blame them in any way.
like this
smallcircles (Humane Tech Now) and Roma like this.
Dr. Percy reshared this.
smallcircles (Humane Tech Now)
in reply to Tio • • •Tio likes this.
Tio
Unknown parent • •Tio
Unknown parent • •