Be afraid.
Be very afraid.
reshared this
Be afraid.
Be very afraid.
Meanwhile, sea surface temperatures across the wider tropical Pacific have set new daily record high levels since April, including a new *all-time* record for this region. 🔥Graphic from climate.copernicus.eu/surface-…
Surface air temperature for May 2026
May 2026 was the second-warmest May globally. Europe experienced its seventh-warmest May and its third warmest spring, with an unusually early and intense heatwave affecting western Europe towards the end of May.climate.copernicus.eu
reshared this
Debbie Goldsmith 🏳️⚧️🏳️🌈, hypebot, Simon Brooke, trending_bot and Licho reshared this.
reshared this
Roknrol reshared this.
Sea surface temperatures are already surging to record high levels for this time of year in key El Niño monitoring areas.
➡️ Sign up for our next monthly state of the climate webinar to learn more: climatecentral-org.zoom.us/web…. We'll also be talking about the hurricane season outlook.
What did May reveal about the state of the climate? This next Monthly Climate Brief will break down the latest global and U.S.Zoom
reshared this
Nyan Max, hypebot, Hannah Steenbock, trending_bot, Truth Or Consequences ✅ 🇺🇦, Egon Willigh☮gen 🟥, Lord Caramac the Clueless, KSC, joene 🏴 and Misha reshared this.
Hey, this is kind of an informal announcement, but my budget is tight and I’m a full-time student. I figured that I’d post here that I’m looking to do some freelance work, particularly when it comes to writing. Most of what I specialize in is open source, exploring technology, how-to guides, interviews, and media production. I also have experience with brand voice, and wouldn’t mind helping with community engagement.
For a sample of my stuff, check out either We Distribute or my blog.
I’ll make a formal blog post about it later today.
This is Sean Tilley's personal website. Sean is a Fediverse veteran who has been involved in the open source and gamedev communities for over 16 years.deadsuperhero
like this
Hypolite Petovan likes this.
reshared this
Stefan Bohacek, wakest ⁂, Roknrol and Misha reshared this.
Student: “So Elon Musk is a trillionaire?”
Me: “Yup.”
Student: “How did he get that much money?”
Me: “Well, he doesn’t really have a trillion dollars cash. He just owns a lot of stock in companies that are valued at a trillion dollars.”
Student: “So those companies make huge profits?”
Me: “Oh gosh no. They all lose billions of dollars a year. All of them. Huge losses.”
The Economist headline: “Gen Z Mysteriously Hates Capitalism and No One Can Figure Out Why.”
reshared this
bituur esztreym, rk: it’s hyphen-minus actually, Mother Bones, Lord Caramac the Clueless, KSC, nellie-m, sb the chippy-choppy, Seirdy, Rudolf Mühland, Glyph, Robey ☠️, Jurjen Heeck 🍋, Quixoticgeek, KaKetelmug, Karl Voit, petitevieille, Volewica, colapunk, Oliver 👔, Disisdeguey🍉🔻PalestineAction🇵🇸, Kim Spence-Jones 🇬🇧😷, joene 🏴, Wen, tante, Christo. London, England., sebsauvage, Paul Cantrell, Martin Marheinecke, Glyn Moody, Grant Denkinson, António Manuel Dias, Christine Burns MBE 🏳️⚧️📚⧖, Philip C James, AM💙🏴, Aaron In Minnesota, Debbie Goldsmith 🏳️⚧️🏳️🌈 and Jim Jones reshared this.
@zeenix "Very profitable" is maybe a bit misleading if compared to stock price.
Tesla stock is valued at 403.8 with $477M last quarter net income, and $3.86B 12-month net income.
BMW stock is valued at 85 with $1.37B last quarter net income, and $7.52B 12-month net income.
I picked first random car company, but I'd wager the comparison is pretty similar no matter what.
@ananas @zeenix
It doesn't make sense to compare the share prices for different companies. Any company can have whatever share price it wants by issuing or buying back shares, by having stock splits or (whatever the opposite is called, I've forgotten). You need to compare the market capitalisation (share price multiplied by the number of shares). And that makes it look even more ludicrous.
Tesla's market cap is $1.506 T.
BMW's is €43 B (around $50 B).
Tesla's market valuation is around 30x that of BMW (not the 5x that the stock prices alone would imply).
A market valuation for a company is typically a combination of how well it's doing at the moment (profit) and how much people expect it to grow. BMW is probably a relatively stable company, but the price for Tesla is assuming that it will grow by a factor of about 300. Tesla sold a bit under 2M cars last year (including some slightly dodgy accounting with Musk's companies selling to each other). That's close to 2% of total car sales. So a factor of 50x growth would mean that they have 100% of the total addressable market. More than that requires the market expanding significantly or them moving into completely new markets.
This is why Tesla is referred to as a 'meme stock': the valuation has absolutely nothing to do with how much money the company is expected to be and 100% to do with the supply of greater fools.
SpaceX's S-1 revealed hundreds of millions in Tesla purchases — and a Cybertruck order that may have boosted 2025 sales.Ben Shimkus (Business Insider)
@failedLyndonLaRouchite There are two plausible pathways to that projection coming true:
1) Elmo invents magic, conquers time and space, and personally leads/profits from humanity’s colonization of space.
2) The Us govt gives SpaceX that much money every year in exchange for a rocket that is totally going to work and definitely deliver human colonization within the next ten years and this time boy oh boy we are serious.
3) The AI bubble crashes the US economy so badly that there's hyperinflation on the US dollar and $3.4 T is roughly the cost of a small loaf of bread in 2040.
I do wonder if this is the goal for a load of the datacenter investors: buying a load of land and so on as fixed-interest bond debt and pushing inflation up so much that inflation is much higher than the interest rate so that the debt evaporates.
@failedLyndonLaRouchite SpaceX loses money because the only profitable arm is StarLink. SpaceX and X.com lose some money, and xAI loses a ton like every other AI company.
LLMs are very expensive to make and operate. All LLM companies have burned through billions trying to hook customers through subsidized pricing. Datacenters have physical world realities that software does not and bringing them online is slow. So compute hungry LLMs are getting real world limits imposed, so LLM companies are moving to usage based billing. Enterprise customers are getting a taste of what’s to come with exploding LLM costs. Learning these tools are actually not cheap.
So SpaceX hiding xAI, OpenAI, Anthropic, etc. need to IPO before the truth comes out. Their investors want a return ASAP so they don’t take huge losses when the truth is exposed. To do this they changed the rules of the Nasdaq to allow these upside down companies to be placed on the index so index funds and other algorithmic buyers push the risk to the public.
The public buys and takes on high risk, early investors can cash out to a level of risk they are happy with. A handful of billionaires and new trillionaires laugh all the way to the bank because their latest confidence game worked.
Privatize profits and socialize losses at its finest.
@huntingdon as I've gotten older and been exposed to more of the world, it's become impossible to see economists as anything more than bootlickers for whichever powerful status quo needs a pseudoscientific veneer of validation this decade (the concept of "revealed preferences" is about as damning for their field as "oppositional defiant disorder" is for psychiatry).
Unfortunately, you can't really say that kind of thing at an average cocktail party without sounding like one of those people who drinks their own urine and thinks 5G puts a chip in your head. But we're slowly getting to a place of deserved skepticism for fields that have long played fast and loose with academic rigor.
Anyways, the Economist is a hilarious example of exactly the material you'd expect, from people who would name themselves "the Economist" without a hint of self-awareness or irony.
@dpflug It's not well known. I could maybe talk about it with more nuance under better conditions, but I happened to just wake up in the middle a medical incident *and* ODD doesn't deserve nuance, so I think flippant should be fine.
Imagine there was a diagnosis in the DSM5 that pathologized not accepting authority, especially the authority of psychiatrists. If you refuse any part of the treatment regimen they demand, it's further proof that you're sick and need intervention. Imagine further that black people were diagnosed at a much higher rate than white people. Okay stop imagining, that's ODD.
I have no personal skin in this specific game. I've never been diagnosed with something like that, and with my complexion, it's unlikely. But as long as it's on the books, it can be selectively enforced, and if that sounds like a tiny part of a big picture that psychiatry is an arm of the carceral state and we're just used to downplaying the cop-adjacency of the industry, you're on the money.
@MaddieM4
Ah, I had no clue. Thanks!
I'm sorry you're dealing with a medical incident. These meatbags can be inconveniently unreliable sometimes. I hope it resolves quickly for you.
The folk singer-songwriter David Rovics has a song called Oppositional Defiant Disorder on just this topic.
(David is also on the Fediverse at @davidrovics @davidrovics)
As Rovics points out: George Bush is a moron and Tony Blair's a liar? Think it would be fun to hit a Rush Limbaugh punching bag? Hate your local Walmart? Have you called your congressman a corporate tool? Does bombing other countries make you feel appalled?
Well then, you have a problem with authority.
The minor detail that it's based on reason or fact is beside the point...
Here's the song:
youtube.com/watch?v=NvXfAawgSq…
And a live version:
youtube.com/watch?v=GWF9mTKum-…
Auf YouTube findest du die angesagtesten Videos und Tracks. Außerdem kannst du eigene Inhalte hochladen und mit Freunden oder gleich der ganzen Welt teilen.David Rovics - Topic (YouTube)
@rupert "Milliardaire" is a french term, meaning billionaire, "Billionnaire" in french means trillionnaire... if I understood it correctly...
Not that it matters in any case...
that's a millennial.
You destroyed capitalism by eating avocados and not having pensions.
I'm GenX. We destroyed capitalism by genuinely not giving a shit and doing way too many drugs.
Near real-time visualizations [Arctic Climate Seasonality and Variability] [Arctic Sea-Ice Extent and Concentration] [Arctic Sea-Ice Volume and Thickness] [Arctic Temperatures] [Antarctic Sea-Ice E…Zack Labe (Zachary Labe)
The planet doesn’t negotiate. It sends signals: rising seas, wildfires, heatwaves.
The EU responds with commitments like:
🔸Water Resilience Strategy
🔹Chemical Regulation
🔸EU Climate Law (net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050)
🔹Restoring nature and repairing damaged ecosystems
Change is accelerating: solar and wind infrastructure is expanding, cities are being redesigned around nature.
This World Environment Day, the debate isn't if climate change is real, but how fast we can act.
> net-zero greenhouse gas emissions by 2050
it used to be "by 2030"
@Catha @European Commission there are so many problems out there and I think it is relevant and necessary to talk about trade. As long as we base our society on this mechanism, it is like monopoly and and we see problems everywhere.
We need more #trade-free goods & services and the #EU can fund those people who do amazing work and without that, our society would collapse: directory.trade-free.org/
that is your solution to tackle #climateChange? To tax hard working #farmers which produce organic food and clean our air?
To make things even worse, the alternative is the production of #plasticFood which is carcinogenic and further pollutes our environment.
2050 is way, way too late!!!
Time to act guys, no more self-advertising post!
Those AC units are part of the solution if they can be reversed and used as heat.
Your AC isn't your problem, Europe, your gas-dependent heating systems are.
You are repeating solar and wind, but those are unfortunately unrealible.
Geothermal power-plants seems as a great ecological solution while also providing the opportunity to mine while producing electricity.
UK did it, we shall too. :)
European Union is a still a work in progress...
But why on earth is the EU Commission so slow on climate change : THE most important battle in our life time. THE ONE AND ONLY.
ACT NOW!!!
mastodon.social/@Alb_/11219745…
Attached: 1 image Courtesy of myself ! 🙂. Feel free to use. European Union is still a work in progress...Alb_ (Mastodon)
Attached: 3 images #Report by the United Nations University quantifies, for the first time, the carbon, #water and land footprint of #AI. The figures are staggering : 945 TWh of electricity projected for 2030, 9.DansLeRuSH ᴱᶰ (FLOSS.social)
Only two survived after trekking more than 50km (30 miles) across the desert to alert the authorities.Wycliffe Muia (BBC News)
First they take away your land, its resources and then livelihoods while making false climate-related promises.
JBS: Keep your bloody business out of Africa!
insideclimatenews.org/news/310…
The advocacy group says the lawsuit could open a new legal frontier for pursuing industrial agriculture companies.Derek Harrison (Inside Climate News)
Bots just officially outnumbered humans on the internet for the first time ever. Cloudflare’s latest report shows AI and agentic traffic has grown so fast its now the majority of online traffic. We crossed a line and most people didn’t even notice 😳 radar.cloudflare.com/traffic#b…
Dead internet theory is now becoming a reality
reshared this
⠵⠻⠷⠕⠭ 🍥🍉⚪🌹, magicmarcy, botwiki.org, trending_bot, Shaun Chamberlin, ⏩︎VOTE⏪︎ ᶜʸⁿⁱᶜⁱˢᵐ⁼ᵃᶜᶜᵉᵖᵗᵃⁿᶜᵉ (Ben Royce), hypebot, sb the chippy-choppy, JonChevreau 🇨🇦, joene 🏴, Juan Per¢ent,🇲🇽 🍉,🇻🇪, Wen, Dave Rahardja, ⊥ᵒᵚ Cᵸᵎᶺᵋᶫ∸ᵒᵘ ☑️, Kim Spence-Jones 🇬🇧😷, Lord Caramac the Clueless, KSC, Lisa Melton, Nyan Max, Disisdeguey🍉🔻PalestineAction🇵🇸, stux⚡️, Viss, #/usr/sbin/rtheren, nichu42, Vee, si_irini, KaKetelmug, Martin Marheinecke, Svenja, Roknrol and Libertad reshared this.
Roknrol reshared this.
Also wild to look at Singapore: Bot: 90% Human 10%
radar.cloudflare.com/traffic/s…
Context:
wired.com/story/made-in-china-…
From small publishers to US federal agencies, websites are reporting unusual spikes in automated traffic linked to IP addresses in Lanzhou, China.Zeyi Yang (WIRED)
botwiki.org reshared this.
The data is about requests, not individuals.
Since an agentic AI can make thousands of request in a very short time, we can assume that a typical agentic AI makes much more requests a day than a human, so the number of humans on the Internet would be still much bigger than AI agents.
It is sad to see that more than half of the traffic is due to bots, but let's don't blow it out of proportion.
Bulletin Board Systems to the rescue.
🤓🙂↕️
m.youtube.com/playlist?list=PL…
Long before the Internet escaped from the lab, connected the planet and redefined what it meant to use a computer...there was a brave and pioneering band of ...Jason Scott (YouTube)
[Insert Planet of the Apes beach scene]
😱
I am constantly accused of being a bot due to use of NoScript. Then I have to keep enabling things and refreshing until the page more or less works. Often with many refreshes before I appear human enough.
I should just set my browser agent string to "Hey I am a human please let me in."
Roknrol reshared this.
HTTP is not "the internet".
If you look at the top of the webpage you've linked, it says that 66% of traffic is for Human users.
We noticed way before the 50% mark, but didn't know the numbers.
This was the goal of AI: to pollute and make useless human communications.
hm a paradox. Every single time a human (the 42.5%) tries to visit a website, a security bot instantly wakes up in the background to scan them and ask, 'Are you a bot?'
That automated security scan generates its own automated data traffic. This means the bots are literally counting their own shadows.
the 57.5% bot traffic only exists because a human clicked a link first!The chart isn't tracking pure intent—it is just tracking a machine running in circles to check its own walls.
Roknrol reshared this.
I dug into the report. The data doesn't support the claim. Cloudflare is lying to you.
flyingpenguin.com/cloudflare-c…
Cloudflare CEO is Lying to You About the Bot Traffic Jumpflyingpenguin
Roknrol reshared this.
Roknrol reshared this.
I run some govt/ngo open data sites and I’d say that 99% of my traffic is bots or inorganic.
Most with very specific url patterns, many thousands of ips, and realistic current browser user agents.
that's not what the report says.
They started filtering by content type recently, it seems (in the last three weeks). *That* has been over 50% during all that time.
If you switch to "all", you get data on a larger time range, and *that* is not over 50% for bots.
Also, you have to specify the region. The screenshots are worldwide.
I can confirm that on my websites, but bots exceed 70% to 80% traffic.
And no way I'd be using Cloudflare to fight back, not giving a US company all my users' traffic (including their credentials), I'm quite successfully using a self-hosted Anubis.
Which questions Cloudflare's stats anyway, obviously they can only measure what they proxify (granted, quite a lot) and I already read last year that that threshold was already crossed.
Sad anyway, however accurate, this is internet enshitification.
Sensitive content
The WEB... not The Internet ... THE WEB.
They are Not the same damned thing.
Ir-regardless of what exactly these numbers look like, it is too much.
I have been building websites for the last 20 years and it has gotten insane...
It is too much and bad actors are abusing the system.
Considering the bloody thing can't identify humans reliably, who's to say this is true?
The bugger throwing a Hissy Fit and blocking you for daring to use a VPN does not make you a bot.
EDIT: NB I am saying the figure could be higher or lower.
Cloudflare is the bane of my online existence.
🌳 Believe me, we noticed.
Chuck
in reply to Peter Gleick • • •Julima
in reply to Peter Gleick • • •Can anything be done? If so, what?
Simon Brooke
in reply to Peter Gleick • • •we are, Peter, we are.
But the end of the world won't happen until after the next election, so our politicians are oblivious.
Mark van Bijnen
in reply to Simon Brooke • • •Simon Brooke reshared this.
Phil Wolff
in reply to Peter Gleick • • •Javensbukan
in reply to Peter Gleick • • •shem
in reply to Peter Gleick • • •Alathea
in reply to Peter Gleick • • •Socratease
in reply to Peter Gleick • • •Koyaanisqatsi
Ko.yaa.nis.katsi
noun
Definition: 1. Life out of balance. 2. Life of moral corruption and turmoil. 3. Crazy life. 4. Life in turmoil.5. A state of life that calls for another way of living.
Origin: Hopi. According to Hopi Dictionary: Hopìikwa Lavàytutuveni, the prefix koyaanis means “corrupted” or “chaotic”, and the word qatsi means “life” or “existence”, literally translating koyaanisqatsi as “chaotic life”.
diesUndDasMitTassen 🇺🇦
in reply to Peter Gleick • • •