Skip to main content


I wish Manyverse would take off - https://www.manyver.se/ - 100% decentralized social network based on scuttlebutt.

After I release TROM II I will try, little by little, to fully migrate to these decentralized platforms like Scuttlebutt and Tox for messaging. We really need that and not servers and centralization.

The Fediverse and Matrix, are great for now. But they are what I like to call as decentralized centralization. Several servers instead of 1. And only a few have most of the users, thus have immense control over the entire network.

~zinricky reshared this.

Unknown parent

Tio
Yes I use Syncthing a lot. It is my main file sharing tool. I also use Bittorrent a lot for al of my media needs. Tox seems to be one great network for messaging that I will try to switch over to maybe next year.
Unknown parent

Tio
I do not know the details
in reply to Tio

Messengers like Tox doesn't require you to join a server and you can start connecting with friends right away, but when I installed Manyverse on my phone its asking me to join a room/pub server to connect with people. I think a truly decentralized p2p app should at least allow us to connect directly with friends, like how Tox does it, no need to go and find a server for yourself. Having servers in the network is not a big issue, but we shouldn't be completely reliant on it.
@aral @tychosoft
in reply to Rokosun

in reply to Tio

Interestingly, my first stab at a decentralised platform (Heartbeat) used Syncthing under the hood:

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=kbfvEBfHO-M#t=22m55s

(Apparently Mastodon embeds do not obey the time offset setting – CC @Gargron – so please either click on the link or manually forward to ~22m55s for the relevant bit. Unless you want to watch the whole talk, that is, which is also perfectly fine by me.) 😛

@tychosoft
This entry was edited (1 year ago)
in reply to Rokosun

100%! This was my main criticism of the scuttlebutt project that you have to join these "pubs". It is better than how the fediverse works but it will still concentrate power into big pubs that can refuse you if the admin wishes to.
in reply to Rokosun

Am sure we could fins solutions for these issues. We can sync pentabytes of data via the bittorrent network and sync them across millions of peers.
in reply to Tio

I also wish these kinds of things would take off. Part of me wants it to be easy for all of my existing friends to join up, and another part wants to make new friends of the sort who would be interested in doing the work to make this stuff work. Quite the tension!
in reply to Aral Balkan

A social network that uses Syncthing under the hood, what an awesome idea! And I also really appreciate the way you showcased the importance of accessibility, very good presentation.
@tio @tychosoft @Gargron
in reply to Rokosun

Thanks, I thought so too at the time 😀 But we also needed to integrate it more closely than just running it as a separate process and Jakob was initially involved so I thought we could do that but he decided he wanted to concentrate on Syncthing alone (fair enough) so we never managed to move beyond a certain point. The experience taught me a lot about having control over your core tech & my eventual disillusionment with Apple paved the way for the small web work.

@tio @tychosoft
@Tio
in reply to Tio

@Tio
Yeah, but if you sync your social media posts via bittorrent across millions of peers then you won't be able to edit or delete your post, we need the opposite of this, to keep your posts in your own device and maybe also a server of your choosing (so that people can access your posts when you're offline). Bittorrent is good for sharing media, but won't work well for a social media.
@Tio
in reply to Aral Balkan

in reply to Rokosun

I am quite sure bittorrent and the new torrent files are now editable by the "owner" of them. You can look it up but am pretty sure that's the new way and works. Plus you have something like the DAT network that was experimental in this regards and worked like that with edits being pushed by the owner of files. Basically they showcased you can have dynamic websites that are fully p2p.
in reply to Tio

@Tio
Peer to peer websites using bittorrent, that sounds like a cool idea! 😃
@Tio
in reply to Tio

Thanks + ditto, very interested in your approach and work. And I have no idea how you manage to be so prolific but I’m glad you are.

Happy to chat anytime 😀
in reply to Tio

+1
server-based services, even when decentralized as in federated, are vulnerable to recentralization. that's why I prefer truly distributed, P2P systems.
in reply to Alexandre Oliva

In my experience with talking to people, P2P is a bit confusing. They either confuse it for client-queue-client or think of something like BitTorrent or perhaps I2P. I think F2F is a more precise term that describes a very specific type of P2P: https://wikiless.northboot.xyz/wiki/Friend-to-friend?lang=en
@tio
@Tio
in reply to CyberSpook

Also, it really does look to me that decentralization is the same kind of buzzword as "cloud computing" nowadays, grouping together F2F, BitTorrent, federation, blockchain and Web3 (which is a bunch of closed-off prisons built on proprietary technology). It's almost as if these terms are deliberately used to muddy the waters.
@tio
@Tio
in reply to CyberSpook

yeah, p2p e2e crypto seems to have been captured term-by-term 🙁

F2F works for social media contexts, but I'd like to have P2P rather than client/server as a software architecture core design principle, for many more contexts, to try and recover (conquer?) the notion of cloud as a user-beneficial rather than user-exploitative concept.

https://www.fsfla.org/blogs/lxo/draft/decent-computing.en.html
vs
https://www.fsfla.org/blogs/lxo/pub/wwworst-app-store.en.html
in reply to CyberSpook

First time I hear of Friend to Friend....interesting. I tested Retroshare a lot in the past and I wanted to move all of my projects' work there but never really worked well for me. I think it is not maintained in some time now...a shame...
in reply to Tio

I think Retroshare and Scuttlebutt are fairly similar, Manyverse is just a client for Scuttlebutt. Similar to how Mastodon is the server back-end for accessing the Fediverse.
@lxo
in reply to CyberSpook

Yes I know, maybe I gave the wrong impression that Manyverse is a network while in fact it is a client for the scuttlebutt network. Same as Mastodon is for the fediverse.