hahaa! Successfully removed all IR and UV filters from my old Canon EOS 600D, I can do full spectrum, UV and IR photography now!
All of the following photos have been taken with a ~550nm+ lpf, meaning cutting everything under 550nm (blue, purple and uv) off. I love the vibrant pink foliage and dramatic turquoise skies #photography
reshared this






Jana
in reply to Jana • • •this is so cool!! Taking photos with atypical spectra is a lot of fun, even with the rather old and bulky camera. The imaging technique used here emulates old Kodak Aerochrome film stock. It’s not available anymore, but used to be a colour IR film, which mapped the IR on the blue channel, while remapping red and green to get this pink-foliage look. I do the same here! Blue is solely IR and swapped with the red channel in post. #photography
reshared this
Paul Cantrell and Aaron In Minnesota reshared this.
Jana
in reply to Jana • • •I also retook a few recent photos in this lovely Aerochrome-style IR! They actually look fantastic, not even sure which versions I like more now.. :D #photography
Jana
in reply to Jana • • •The camera also is already nutria approved!! Got sniffed and was found to be okay (I think..)
Also, man, water!! The turquoise is just fantastic! #photography
Jana
in reply to Jana • • •There are some hardships though, since the camera now sees a lot more light (the full IR spectrum), but the light-meter cannot process that properly, auto-exposing is off by about 2 steps. Even worse, with the missing filters and the phase-detect diodes not being in that path anyways, the auto-focus is now off by a tiny bit. You can get used to it, but at first, I was just way off with my focus and exposure.
The resulting images are also very much discoloured, this is because the red and blue channels have to be swapped, which given that I shoot raw becomes annoying. I don't think there is a command line tool to switch two channels in a canon raw-file (.cr2), imagemagick will just invoke darktable.
Using darktable for development would be great, but I sadly have a bunch of bugs with it and my tool of choice is anyways DxO PhotoLab... which cannot swap colour channels -.-
So my workflow right now is to demosaic all photos in DxO, export them as 16bit tif files, then run a batch imagemagick command to swap the red and blue channel on all photos, just to re-import t
... Show more...There are some hardships though, since the camera now sees a lot more light (the full IR spectrum), but the light-meter cannot process that properly, auto-exposing is off by about 2 steps. Even worse, with the missing filters and the phase-detect diodes not being in that path anyways, the auto-focus is now off by a tiny bit. You can get used to it, but at first, I was just way off with my focus and exposure.
The resulting images are also very much discoloured, this is because the red and blue channels have to be swapped, which given that I shoot raw becomes annoying. I don't think there is a command line tool to switch two channels in a canon raw-file (.cr2), imagemagick will just invoke darktable.
Using darktable for development would be great, but I sadly have a bunch of bugs with it and my tool of choice is anyways DxO PhotoLab... which cannot swap colour channels -.-
So my workflow right now is to demosaic all photos in DxO, export them as 16bit tif files, then run a batch imagemagick command to swap the red and blue channel on all photos, just to re-import them in DxO for final development. This actually not tedious, just time intensive...
Anymeow, this is how a raw image without development actually looks like. The white-purple foliage is actually neat, maybe I will do something with it as well some time, but for now I enjoy the pink-turquoise style more
TomKrajci 🇺🇦 🏳️🌈 🏳️⚧️
in reply to Jana • • •FWIW, here are some near-IR shots I've taken with a camera that has all UV/IR filters removed...and the Bayer color array...so it's a monochrome camera...a poor person's version of a Leica.
universeodon.com/@KrajciTom/11…
universeodon.com/@KrajciTom/11…
universeodon.com/@KrajciTom/11…
universeodon.com/@KrajciTom/11…
TomKrajci 🇺🇦 🏳️🌈 🏳️⚧️ (@KrajciTom@universeodon.com)
TomKrajci 🇺🇦 🏳️🌈 🏳️⚧️ (Universeodon Social Media)FWIW, here are some near-IR shots I've taken with a camera that has all UV/IR filters removed...and the Bayer color array...so it's a monochrome camera...a poor person's version of a Leica.
universeodon.com/@KrajciTom/11…
universeodon.com/@KrajciTom/11…
universeodon.com/@KrajciTom/11…
universeodon.com/@KrajciTom/11…
TomKrajci 🇺🇦 🏳️🌈 🏳️⚧️
2025-09-24 17:25:13
Ray McCarthy
in reply to TomKrajci 🇺🇦 🏳️🌈 🏳️⚧️ • • •Really good IR needs a dedicated camera.
I also have an IR LED array. A cheaper sort of phone camera or old vidicon "sees" with it easily. but almost useless for the Canon, which is good really.
The cheap phone "sees" the UV light very differently too!
TomKrajci 🇺🇦 🏳️🌈 🏳️⚧️
in reply to Ray McCarthy • • •@raymaccarthy
Here are some options to get a dedicated IR (and even UV if you remove all the filters):
monochromeimaging.com/
kolarivision.com/product/full-…
Or find a discarded point-and-shoot at a flea market and hack into it yourself. You can find how-to vid's on YouTube.
I have experimented a bit with portraiture in various bands using a full-spectrum camera. In near-IR everyone has pasty white skin. Think of the scenes in Dune 2.
youtube.com/shorts/5UEGpAvaeEU
If you shoot in near-UV, every freckle or other dark skin mark looks like a blotch of india ink. Folks can look 20 years older in near-UV.
Dune: Part Two Used INFRARED Cameras for This Scene
Heartsnreels (YouTube)space slut
in reply to TomKrajci 🇺🇦 🏳️🌈 🏳️⚧️ • • •(how did you get rid of the Bayer filter o.o?)
TomKrajci 🇺🇦 🏳️🌈 🏳️⚧️
in reply to space slut • • •@spacekatia
Thanks for asking.
monochromeimaging.com/ did the conversion for me. I sent them a used Sony a6300 body.
They never told me how they did it, and I never asked...but my hunch is that they removed the sensor from the camera body and then heated it...just enough to soften the adhesive that held the Bayer filter in place, gently pried it off, and put the sensor back in the body with some spacers to change the sensor height. They had to do that because removing a glass filter out of the converging optical path shifts the resulting focal plane...so they set sensor height so that my manual lenses had the same focus setting...infinity focus setting remained the same after the conversion, give or take a few thousandths of an inch. Works for me. Your mileage may vary.
space slut
in reply to TomKrajci 🇺🇦 🏳️🌈 🏳️⚧️ • • •@KrajciTom from my research into doing it myself, it looks like most manufacturers use dyed versions of the same kind of photoresist that's used when producing the silicon itself make the bayer filter
the correct way to removie it is to buy the dedicated hard-baked-photoresist remover from 3m, some horrbile concoction of solvents that you apply to the chip boiling hot
Kim Possible
in reply to Jana • • •