Search

Items tagged with: ietf


I've been working on updating a decision making process in a #coop from #voting to #consensus inspired by #ietf #decisionMaking process when a colleague made me realize that consensus process is not compatible with many #neurodivergent cognitive styles. It disproportionately favors #Neurotypicals and extraverted ppl while putting more introverted and less verbal type people at a disadvantage. Also it's yet another "social capital" dominated decision making process. Less social capital - less likely you'll actually speak up against the crowd.

The "no one left behind" goal is not fulfilled by the "no loud opposition" decision process. What process does that? We're staying with the simplistic voting for now but adding a prolonged debate. Any ideas? How other #cooperatives do that? Especially #anarchist ones?

#autism #adhd #audhd #dyslexia #socialAnxiety #ptsd #spectrum #anarchism #anarchistOrder #socialism #cooperative




I have been in a few of the many, many conversations this week at #IETF regarding if and how to built new Internet protocols for AI agents, and I have so many questions. So many, but maybe also just one. Are we ultimately moving towards building a separate internet (lowercase on purpose) just for AI? Is that what all these discussions lead to?

FWIW, I think that’s probably a terrible idea. I don’t think I’ve heard anything that suggests the problems we’re attempting to solve are specific to agentic AI. AI, as always, makes things go faster (and so scale is a legit problem) but the discovery problems, the identification problems, the authentication and authorization problems… they aren’t precisely new. There are more of them, and there are questions as to whether agents have any right to privacy, but do we need entirely new protocols to account for that?

hmmmmmm.

#IETF


With over 100 active Internet Drafts on various topics around AI, a third of the available side meetings, and nearly half of the HotRFC lightning talks at #IETF 126, I’m feeling more than a little overwhelmed with all the heat and so very little light.
#IETF


📍 Afnic is heading to IETF 126!

From July 18 to 24, vincent levigneron and Sandoche Balakrichenan are representing Afnic at IETF 126.

If you're attending, feel free to stop by and connect with them to discuss Internet standards, DNS and Afnic's technical contributions to the Internet community.

See you there! 👋

#Afnic #IETF #DNS


Opened a ticket at @videolan about the issue of selecting the wrong interface for #multicast: code.videolan.org/videolan/vlc…
It's basically the same issue I had also reported for #Qaul / #libp2p: github.com/libp2p/rust-libp2p/…
It would be really great if #IETF #RFCs could give a better guidance on which interface for multicast an application or OS should choose.


#IETF


#IETF


#IETF #rfc


I wrote a #IETF -00 draft for @ietf_wg_dnsop on #DNS Domain Delegation Validation, intended to provide a path around the "Sitting Ducks" issues that @briankrebs and many others have called out over the years where DNS Lame Delegations can be hijacked due to lack of validation:

datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/…

We split it off of datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/… because we're really hoping to finally get that done and published.


The Free And Open Web Is Under Attack At The IETF


The ability to access publicly available information using automated tools is a central value and benefit of a free and open internet. Automated access—often called crawling or scraping—powers important, useful tools for locating, preserving, and analyzing online information. For example, crawling and scraping helps journalists, researchers, and watchdog organizations report the news, find security flaws, and investigate […]


The #EFF (@eff) is right about the fear of system overloads caused by surging bot traffic:
eff.org/deeplinks/2026/06/free…

"However reasonable these fears may be, the answer is not to change the #IETF #standards from neutral protocols that encourage openness to restrictive requirements designed to monetize internet access."

#AI #Internet #InternetEngineeringTaskForce #OpenInternet



The key questions for the CATALIST BoF at #IETF125 about #AI activities at #IETF include:

—-
• What broad topics belong in the IETF scope?
• Which working groups are already active?
• Enough expertise/people in the IETF for new work?
• What coordination activity would be useful?
• Why are existing processes not enough?
• Would a coordination/discussion group be useful?
• Would similar future meetings be useful?
• If we have another meeting, what should the scope be?