So, you know how every time folks shift from Twitter to Mastodon, there’s always a bunch of grumpy peeps?
They’re all like, “Mastodon doesn’t have all the fancy-schmancy features Twitter has!”
Well, here’s the deal, my friend: you’re here in the Fediverse because of one particular dude (Elon, we’re looking at you) who went ahead and bought Twitter.
But guess what? The Fediverse ain’t up for sale, my friend. Nope, not happening. It’s a fortress of decentralization that can’t be conquered by cash.
So, while we admit that the Fediverse may not be the smoothest ride right now, let’s get some perspective, shall we?
The beauty of this place is that it’s immune to all the craptastic ways Elon messed up Twitter. He can’t lay a finger on the Fediverse—ever!
So, kick back, relax, and enjoy this wild and untamed oasis of online freedom. Elon-proof, forever!
... Show more...So, you know how every time folks shift from Twitter to Mastodon, there’s always a bunch of grumpy peeps?
They’re all like, “Mastodon doesn’t have all the fancy-schmancy features Twitter has!”
Well, here’s the deal, my friend: you’re here in the Fediverse because of one particular dude (Elon, we’re looking at you) who went ahead and bought Twitter.
But guess what? The Fediverse ain’t up for sale, my friend. Nope, not happening. It’s a fortress of decentralization that can’t be conquered by cash.
So, while we admit that the Fediverse may not be the smoothest ride right now, let’s get some perspective, shall we?
The beauty of this place is that it’s immune to all the craptastic ways Elon messed up Twitter. He can’t lay a finger on the Fediverse—ever!
So, kick back, relax, and enjoy this wild and untamed oasis of online freedom. Elon-proof, forever!
Adam Hunt
in reply to Danie • • •Danie likes this.
herve_02
in reply to Danie • • •the major problem with systemd is that it was pushed by lennart pottering when he was working at red hat, and little by little it is phagocyting (extending and embracing) the entire system. He'd already made a name for himself when he built an overlay to alsa that created more problems than it solved. so red hat has a stranglehold on mass distribution, and surprisingly ibm buys red hat and closes down red hat enterprise's sources.
if you add the attack launched by windows with WSL and the FSF's , the "woke" attack on free software (free as speach), linus and stallman. it stinks.
that's what needs to be explained, not that it's easier to have a unified system that allows a single person (or company) to produce for all systems. if you're looking for a unified system, go to windows or apple. don't try to make linux the next windows or apple.
from my point of view, to send a signal to ibm, you need to eject pulsaudio and systemd from distributions. It's not about being simple, it's about being free AND independent.
Translated with www.DeepL.com/Translator (free version)
like this
Alarc'h and Danie like this.
Kenny Chaffin
in reply to Danie • • •Danie likes this.
Adam Hunt
in reply to Danie • • •Danie likes this.
Harka
in reply to Danie • • •Danie likes this.
herve_02
in reply to Danie • • •@Harka
Adam Hunt
in reply to Danie • • •The Ubuntu Diaries Part II
web.ncf.caDanie likes this.
tom s
in reply to Danie • • •Greg A. Woods (another old account)
in reply to Danie • • •As the old saying went: Friends don't let their friends run Windows, or Systemd. 🙂🙃
I find it both hilarious and sad that so many people confuse the 'init' process and what it really needs to do with all the other things that modern systems must run to provide all the fancy features we expect of them today.
As is that article seems, at least to a Linux outsider such as myself, to present a rather narrow, limited, and system-centric view of the greater problem.
NetBSD all the way for me, at least anywhere where I have to or want to work on the code!
ℝ𝕠𝕓𝕚𝕟
in reply to Danie • • •herve_02
in reply to Danie • • •there is a gap between what companies and geeks think about fancy features expected and what is really expected. there is a bunch of people that want look and feels but they have macos or windows. Let's keep linux safe of those craps to keep linux users happy instead of trying to convert those who do not care about privacy or freedom yo import their feelings in our systems.
is it interesting that people thinking about how to import windows users or companies (lennart with pulseaudio and systemd OR de icaza with mono) BOTH work at microsoft now? are/were they friends or ennemies ?
Adam Hunt
in reply to Danie • • •Stallman on systemd
"I know it's free software, so ethically speaking, it's not an issue – it's just a convenience question." - Richard Stallman (2015)
It should be noted that Stallman uses Trisquel which has used systemd since 2014.
Stallman joins the Internet, talks net neutrality, patents and more
Network WorldDanie likes this.
Greg A. Woods (another old account)
in reply to Danie • • •W.r.t. "fancy features", I don't think the vast majority of the past couple of iterations, nor the current iteration, of software developers have any capacity whatsoever to implement those features in an elegant, efficient, and well structured way.
For example Linux has (primarily, in most distributions) ended up with GNOME, which is arguably a bigger horror show on the inside than anything Microsoft has ever produced.
If Gates and Jobs had paid more attention to the innards of the Xerox Star then maybe we'd be in a slightly better place today, and maybe the likes of systemd would be entirely unthinkable to the vast majority of developers, but that's blue-sky dreaming.
herve_02
in reply to Danie • • •@Adam Hunt
stallman on red hat's... could be
Adam Hunt
in reply to Danie • • •Check the ref, Stallman was talking about using systemd. As noted he uses it everyday.
I have been using it too, for eight years now, with no issues and quick boot times.
It's free software, you can download and read the source code, use it, modify it or fork it if you like. You are also free to use something else if you prefer.
Danie likes this.
antonymIC
in reply to Danie • • •Adam Hunt
in reply to Danie • • •