We have received a Copyright claim from Amazon for our @PeerTube instance videos.trom.tf/ . Hetzner, the hosting company where we have the dedicated server at, gave us 24h to resolve it.
The problem?
The video in question, a documentary about "aliens", a garbage piece of content, was NOT hosted on our instance, of course. But since Peertube is federated the idiots sent the claim to our hosting company. Even if UNDER the video you can see that video is "Posted By:" and the instance and username. It takes a few seconds to see where the video is hosted.
But who cares...maybe Amazon has "AI Agents" employed and they simply find a video of theirs on a URL and see the IP of that URL and submit a Copyright claim to the hosting where that domain is registered?!
Bunch of idiots.
But it is very concerning the fact that they can do these and we, the ones who host (and for free fo
... Show more...We have received a Copyright claim from Amazon for our @PeerTube instance videos.trom.tf/ . Hetzner, the hosting company where we have the dedicated server at, gave us 24h to resolve it.
The problem?
The video in question, a documentary about "aliens", a garbage piece of content, was NOT hosted on our instance, of course. But since Peertube is federated the idiots sent the claim to our hosting company. Even if UNDER the video you can see that video is "Posted By:" and the instance and username. It takes a few seconds to see where the video is hosted.
But who cares...maybe Amazon has "AI Agents" employed and they simply find a video of theirs on a URL and see the IP of that URL and submit a Copyright claim to the hosting where that domain is registered?!
Bunch of idiots.
But it is very concerning the fact that they can do these and we, the ones who host (and for free for that matter), need to quickly "fix" these things even if the claim has nothing to do with our server.
We eventually had to block that URL, thanks Peertube for allowing that, else these idiots cannot understand that it was not us who were hosting that video.
#peertube #fedi #fediverse
M
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •GrapheneOS
in reply to M • • •Apicultor 🐝
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •Instead of drip-feeding it across 20+ posts, why not post the complete thought in one single post? (This would also increase accessibility.)
The character limit per post is easily configurable for you since you run your own instance.
@MAlBarram
GrapheneOS
in reply to Apicultor 🐝 • • •GrapheneOS
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •Rokosun reshared this.
GrapheneOS
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •reshared this
Irenes (many) and Rokosun reshared this.
GrapheneOS
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •Rokosun reshared this.
GrapheneOS
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •Google's reCAPTCHA is planning an approach where they use Privacy Pass on Apple hardware, their own approach on Google Mobile Services Android devices and a QR code scanning system to require an iOS or Google certified Android device for Windows and other systems:
support.google.com/recaptcha/a…
Rokosun reshared this.
GrapheneOS
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •reshared this
⠵⠻⠷⠕⠭ 🍥🍉⚪🌹, Neil Brown and Rokosun reshared this.
GrapheneOS
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •reshared this
⠵⠻⠷⠕⠭ 🍥🍉⚪🌹, Aral Balkan and Rokosun reshared this.
GrapheneOS
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •reshared this
Oli, ⠵⠻⠷⠕⠭ 🍥🍉⚪🌹, Aaron In Minnesota, Phil M0OFX, Aral Balkan and Rokosun reshared this.
GrapheneOS
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •Rokosun reshared this.
GrapheneOS
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •Rokosun reshared this.
GrapheneOS
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •Rokosun reshared this.
GrapheneOS
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •reshared this
David Chisnall (*Now with 50% more sarcasm!*), Aaron In Minnesota and Rokosun reshared this.
GrapheneOS
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •reshared this
Aral Balkan, Leif Samuelsson and Rokosun reshared this.
GrapheneOS
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •reshared this
Aral Balkan, Leif Samuelsson, Kim Spence-Jones 🇬🇧😷, 🫧 socialcoding.., Pam C, Diana Probst, Cambridge Artist, mcc and Rokosun reshared this.
GrapheneOS
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •Rokosun reshared this.
GrapheneOS
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •Rokosun reshared this.
GrapheneOS
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •reshared this
Joseph Simons 🍁 🌱 and Rokosun reshared this.
Linux Is Best
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •It's the goal.
For example, all those new laws for age verification are to prevent you from using an operating system or ROM that cannot be minored or controlled. Blocking reCAPTCHA on a non-approved, non-certified government and corporate sanctioned devices is just 1 piece of the big picture.
For example, the USA has made any new router not made in the USA illegal to import or sell. They can apply for an exception if they agree to include their new control chip or firmware.
Linux Is Best
in reply to Linux Is Best • • •Motorola has a security contract with the USA.
They will, depending on need, release a device with GrapheneOS — or delay it — and work closely with you to identify the methods and vulnerabilities you discover, as well as how you implement features to overcome the planned “new normal,” so that, behind the scenes, they can undermine and circumvent your work in the future. The investment — which includes you — is intended to strengthen relations and acquire additional contracts. 😭
GrapheneOS
in reply to Linux Is Best • • •Daniël
in reply to Linux Is Best • • •Linux Is Best
in reply to Daniël • • •@danieldk
I am the source.
Both Motorola Mobility with Motorola Solutions CAGE Code: 01113, 6H7Z2, 78205, and 7H229 (NCAGE).
dla.mil/Working-With-DLA/Appli…
If you’re looking for an actual document that says, “Yes, we’re trying to screw over the American people,” a written confession in a convenient PDF file, you won’t find one. Ever.
@GrapheneOS
GrapheneOS
in reply to Linux Is Best • • •Linux Is Best
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •@danieldk
Yes, and money goes both ways.
thomas
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •GrapheneOS
in reply to thomas • • •Ox1de
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •M/KΞ
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •i complained on many official service they ignore it, the ombudsman was called and they seem to ignore it too.
they all aswer the bullshit that you are labelled insecure by official tool, because google tool automatically mark non licensed OS as insecure regardless of their actual security.
Papageier
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •Google has the entirety of its commercial success thanks to the openness and interoperability of the #WWW. To try an captcha it to build a walled garden is, frankly speaking, an act of disrespect for @timbl and the entire web community.
Microsoft has tried it. Apple has tried it as well. Both have finally had the insight that working with the community is much more rewarding and profitable than working against it.
Let's work toward Google having that same revelation as well.
(Sorry for the pun, couldn't resist)
GrapheneOS
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •Unified Attestation is another anti-competitive system being pushed by multiple European companies. It will similarly lock people out from using arbitrary hardware and software. That's not a solution and is far worse than Android's much more open hardware attestation API.
grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/…
GrapheneOS
Unified Attestation is another anti-competitive system being pushed by multiple European companies. It will similarly lock people out from using arbitrary hardware and software. That's not a solution and is far worse than Android's much more open hardware attestation API.
grapheneos.social/@GrapheneOS/…
GrapheneOS
2026-03-16 15:19:34
Rokosun reshared this.
GrapheneOS
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •Rokosun reshared this.
M/KΞ
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •ZaZen
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •vvanag
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •Resilience Theatre
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •Matúš
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •LosOS · GitLab
GitLabGrapheneOS
in reply to Matúš • • •GrapheneOS
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •GrapheneOS
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •Mr. Scam Likely
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •vonKordke
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •Governments should take that apart immediately, but they are powerless cowards.
Avi 🟣
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •M/KΞ
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •care to comment @EUCommission @hpod16
i increasily grew annoyed with the EU a** licking of Google and Apple...
Jenica Lake เหล็ถเลถ
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •d@nny disc@
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •luna the doggie
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •adingbatponder 👾
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •Douglas
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •The Brazilian government app "gov.br" requires Play Integrity too. There's no fallback, no alternative verification method.
I've sent complaints to the Brazilian entities suggested in the "Keep Android Open" website, but they either reply with a template message or completely ignore it.
Google is pretty much our Evil Corp, but where is fsociety? 👹
Profile13115
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •ZaZen
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •eske
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •Tim Panton
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •Yann Droneaud
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •Magical Cat
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •G̸u̸a̸l̸t̸i̸e̸r̸o̸
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •🏳️🌈 Brie 🪰🚴🌸✨
in reply to G̸u̸a̸l̸t̸i̸e̸r̸o̸ • • •GrapheneOS
in reply to 🏳️🌈 Brie 🪰🚴🌸✨ • • •🏳️🌈 Brie 🪰🚴🌸✨
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •Certainly it won't be easy. I think we have more allies in this than are currently obvious. The manufacturers that provide Android devices won't like an environment where Google Android is the only game in town. Samsung's entire software offering is proof that they at least are unwilling to cede the entire software stack to Google. The more strictly Google cuts off older devices or unpatched devices, the more control they will be exerting against those manufacturers
@ggrey
Morgan ⚧️
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •Ra
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •June [⚦257-⚧213-⚩099]
in reply to Ra • • •@Ra I can't use the online services of my healthcare provider on my desktop (cant login on their website) without having their app on an android or apple device. I'am effectively being locked out of all of their online services (except contacting them via email).
germany here
Wuzzy
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •Word! I hate #reCAPTCHA with a deep passion. It’s not just annoying but also yet another proprietary software forced on us.
It was bad before Google attempted to expand it further, and will continue to be bad.
The need to kick spambots/etc. out is understandable, but depending on proprietary software to do it is a BAD idea. There are other ways.
Inanna🇵🇸
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •GrapheneOS
in reply to Inanna🇵🇸 • • •@FantasmitaAsex reCAPTCHA is extremely widely adopted. A portion of services using alternatives won't solve how much damage they can do to alternatives via control of reCAPTCHA.
Only a tiny proportion of apps use the Play Integrity API and ban GrapheneOS with it. It's something like 1/10000 apps or even lower but for banking apps it's around 1/10 and important government apps around 2/10. However, it's widely adopted enough that it's a huge barrier to GrapheneOS adoption for people already.
⠵⠻⠷⠕⠭ 🍥🍉⚪🌹
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •Zach777
in reply to ⠵⠻⠷⠕⠭ 🍥🍉⚪🌹 • • •Jon PENNYCOOK
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •Garrett LeSage
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •My bank has been this way for months already. They got rid of other 2FA methods they used to support and require a Google-approved Android OS or iOS... even to log in to their banking UI on a desktop/laptop.
It's infuriating, and it means I'm now 100% locked in to a proprietary app on a proprietary OS (controlled by 1 of 2 companies, both headquartered in California, USA) on a proprietary phone for banking and public transit (in Europe), with no alternative possible. 😖
GrapheneOS
in reply to Garrett LeSage • • •GrapheneOS
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •GrapheneOS attestation compatibility guide
GrapheneOSDidek
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •@garrett
Hardware Attestation should only be used in situation when device is supposed to not be owned by the user. Like an internal service of a company making sure only company-provided devices are accessing it.
Magical Cat
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •Bank I am customer of, in a EU-candidate country, when add some services, makes them available only from mobile device. For example, purchase of travel insurance, which normally happens beforehand, not during travel itself.
I don't see a logical reason to limit a service availability to a weaker in UX sense mobile platform with small screen, half if it usually eaten by on-screen keyboard, and lack of proper mouse/keyboard).
nicholai
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •Georg Weissenbacher
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •Arthur van der Harg
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •Graham K
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •TheZorse
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •I wonder of there's someone you can contact in the Canadian government to try to hard-block this from becoming a requirement with our government, banks, etc., from a national security perspective. You might find a receptive audience given that we're trying to gain some independence from the US.
My feeling is that the government knows that reliance on American tech is a problem and a trap, but they don't have a good grasp of the details or the alternatives.
Buridan's procrastinator ⁂
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •OddOpinions5
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •I know almost nothing about computers
but if Apple/Google are forcing banks to use better* hardware, then I say hooray for A/G
*term not precisely defined, but generally meaning , roughly, more secure
Elric
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •Daniel
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •(read the whole thread)
GrapheneOS
Unknown parent • • •Roberto A. Foglietta
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •-- I am not surprised that they are going for hardware certificates since the CPU chiphering / randomness tampering is going to fade away soon:
github.com/robang74/uchaosys/b…
...and yes, I am again me: the one behind the Sailfish OS refactoring attempt then presented as RedFish OS at SFSCONF 2023. 😁
***
uchaosys/docs/linux-kernel-internals-hacking.md at v071 · robang74/uchaosys
GitHubGrapheneOS
Unknown parent • • •@7cd4a72311bad46117e0f692dddc5f31a543b47ff4265b028f8d820ac808ab3c @MAlBarram Pixels aren't somehow dead and none of what we posted is in any way specific to Pixels, Android devices or operating systems based on the Android Open Source Project.
You should read the thread we posted which is about them bringing the Play Integrity API to the web including for desktops by requiring having a phone certified by it or an iOS device in order to pass checks on the web and desktops too.
Chartodon
Unknown parent • • •@ColinTheMathmo
Your chart is ready, and can be found here:
solipsys.co.uk/Chartodon/11655…
Things may have changed since I started compiling that, and some things may have been inaccessible.
In particular, the very nature of the fediverse means some toots may never have made it to my instance, in which case I can't see them, and can't include them.
The chart will eventually be deleted, so if you'd like to keep it, make sure you download a copy.
Demi Marie Obenour
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •Jay 🚩
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •GrapheneOS
in reply to Jay 🚩 • • •DFX4509B (Joshua Mason)
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •Andreas K
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •There are IMHO few cars when hardware attestation (which btw is the ultimate in anti handicapped stance one can take, I literally remember a decade ago how a colleague modified his Linux workstation to deal with his personal mix of handicaps)
And if there is a need for that there is no need to go with a vendor lock-in solution as the grapheneos crew correctly points out.
But security theater is cheaper than haviyng real competent engineer look over the security design for real.
naph
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •naph
in reply to naph • • •naph
in reply to naph • • •GrapheneOS
in reply to naph • • •Sub_Root
in reply to GrapheneOS • • •Hardened OSs like #GrapheneOS do a great job, but we have a major blind spot: The Hardware.
Modern phones are networks of dozens of "black box" computers (UFS, Baseband, Wi-Fi) running proprietary code we can't audit, disable, secure or replace.
Why this matters:
1️⃣ Persistence: Malware in your UFS/SSD controller survives a factory reset.
2️⃣ Tracking: Hardware Attestation acts as an immutable digital fingerprint.
3️⃣ Shadow Attacks: Zero-click exploits hit your Wi-Fi or Baseband before the OS can even react.
We are calling for #HardwareSovereignty. Inspired by the #OpenBSD philosophy, we demand:
✅ Open & replaceable firmware for ALL subsystems.
✅ User-controlled hardware toggles.
✅ Trust minimization that includes the manufacturer.
It's time to move from "Vendor-Enforced Security" to User Sovereign
... Show more...Hardened OSs like #GrapheneOS do a great job, but we have a major blind spot: The Hardware.
Modern phones are networks of dozens of "black box" computers (UFS, Baseband, Wi-Fi) running proprietary code we can't audit, disable, secure or replace.
Why this matters:
1️⃣ Persistence: Malware in your UFS/SSD controller survives a factory reset.
2️⃣ Tracking: Hardware Attestation acts as an immutable digital fingerprint.
3️⃣ Shadow Attacks: Zero-click exploits hit your Wi-Fi or Baseband before the OS can even react.
We are calling for #HardwareSovereignty. Inspired by the #OpenBSD philosophy, we demand:
✅ Open & replaceable firmware for ALL subsystems.
✅ User-controlled hardware toggles.
✅ Trust minimization that includes the manufacturer.
It's time to move from "Vendor-Enforced Security" to User Sovereignty.
Read the full Open Letter here: pastebin.com/RzRbzhwn
#HardwareSovereignty #Infosec #CyberSecurity #Privacy #OpenSource #TechFreedom
A Call for User-Centric Hardware Sovereignty - Pastebin.com
Pastebindiana 🏳️⚧️🦋🌱 reshared this.