A new hacking campaign is trying to trick Signal users to give up their secret recovery key, which can be used to access online backups containing past messages.
Why #FDroid for your #Android device? No need to "just trust us" about how we check, how we build and why we care, you can look at everything that we do as #FLOSS offers the transparency you want.
Security and privacy come from trust The experience we have with our devices usually feels private and secure. If no one else is looking at our screen, it se...
@GrapheneOS team if you're reading this, I heard that you guys are partnering with Motorola to provide official support for their devices and even the possibility of buying phones with GrapheneOS pre-installed. I was overall pretty happy about this partnership and what it meant for the future of degoogled mobile OSes, however I'm concerned to see Motorola's involvement in this new affiliate link scandal and how shady it was and their overall response after this came out in public. I know this issue doesn't affect GrapheneOS users in particular, but I still wanted to run this by you and see if you guys have any comment on this.
Just to be clear, this incident regarding Motorola has nothing to do with Rossmann so if you are put off by that video then I'll share the source link here - 9to5google.com/2026/05/25/moto…
I fail to see how covertly putting affiliate links like this can be an "unintended" mistake like Motorola claims. I was asking to see if the GrapheneOS team has any comment on this incident.
It's unintended from Motorola's part since it wasn't authorized by them and was done without their permission. That doesn't mean whoever did it didn't intend to do it. It makes no sense for them to put referral codes into Amazon links with the codes tied to an obscure Instagram influencer. It clearly wasn't something authorized. They're having a company which might be problematic do contract work for them or are using their SDK and both seem to have screwed up missing this going in.
I arrived at Þingvellir National Park after 6pm. I set up my tent at the campsite (since wild camping is illegal in the national parks of Iceland), cooked, relaxed, then went for a walk on the main touristy paths of Thingvellir at around 10pm. It was still light out, yet there was nobody around. Amazing. I stood there, in the fault between North America and Eurasia, and admired the striking walls around me. Those walls move away from each other by about 2cm each year; this is an active rift. These walls are part of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge and Iceland is one of few places where you can see the ridge above the surface of the ocean. And what an incredible sight it is, especially when you have it all to yourself.
How cool!! 😎 And the fact that they are moving apart 2cm a year is such a direct evidence of how plate tectonics are a thing, because it is such a recent discovery. Nuts!
LLM advocates still don’t seem to be able to comprehend that ordering the machine not to ‘make stuff up’ doesn’t help. It doesn’t know when it’s making stuff up, and it couldn’t change that even if you told it to. (In fact it’s always just making stuff up, and is only ever true by chance.)
Part of why I’m so negative about them is that their advocates simply do not understand how they work and do not seem to want to.
Hallucinations are the bane of my existence when using Claude Code and that has significantly improved after adding the following instructions to my Claude .MD file.
Sharing for anyone else who uses Claude as a daily driver for analysis and writing but has gotten frustrated by it making things up.
@prietschka I do recall that a few weeks back he was complaining that LLM advocates get made to feel unwelcome on the fediverse. (OK? I don’t care. It’s nobody’s job to make people feel good about their bad opinions.)
And then just a couple of days ago he was posting something critical, and like … yes this is what we’ve been saying all along.
The problem with Obasanjo is he's utterly unprincipled and just chasing engagement/self-aggrandizement. His purpose for being in social spaces like Masto/Bluesky/X is to stroke his ego, so everything he does is just an act of public masturbation.
He's interested in self-aggrandizement and self-promotion, nothing more.
Which is why I use the descriptor "piece of shit" with regard to him.
reminds me of meeting with the business side of my job and the marketing people keep thinking if they word the requirements juuuuust right suddenly I'll be able to do the impossible.
@solonovamax i feel like it's more that it just wasn't built to give out answers, it was trained not to answer truthfully and "understand" but to just come up with something that sounds kind of convincing
@nelson @solonovamax For better and worse, ML is an optimization algorithm designed to provide statistically close-to-ideal responses (with some jitter to break out of bad loops) to arbitrary input based on training (historic data). It's fantastic for, say, industrial control systems that want to keep a chemical reaction under control, but the nature of the math is that you can train it on any sequence of values, and this includes words. The problem is that language has contextual meaning, and the human brain is very much built to see patterns and meaning in things, even when they aren't there. Like how we see faces in clouds, for example. This technology is the faces in clouds engine.
@complexmath @nelson @solonovamax Exactly so. Ada Lovelace, patron saint of code, in the 1840s, gave us "Lady Lovelace’s Objection," whereupon she famously stated that machines "have no pretensions whatever to originate anything," saying they could only perform tasks they were instructed to do.
“AI” LLMs as they are sold to the rubes is just a spellchecker on steroids. It does not reason. It does not think. It correlates data it has been fed to reach a probability.
Telling it to not hallucinate is some serious cargo cult thinking.
@MissConstrue @complexmath @nelson hypothetically it is possible for an artificial agent (read: "AI") to be capable of accurately modeling the world and "thinking", however it seems that this is not currently even remotely the case.
@solonovamax @complexmath @nelson Theoretically, yes. But I point you towards one of my favorite long term AI projects, Cyc. (Whom I haven’t checked up on since Doug died.). I knew Doug since the 80s, and sort of stayed in the loop with what they were doing, because trying to develop an ontological system fascinates me. I want it to happen, I just don’t think we have the compute yet. I’m not sure it can be done with anything less than quantum.
But Doug’s vision of AI had nothing really in common with current LLM, especially since nobody has come up with a way for it to be commercially viable, because that wasn’t the vision. Knowledge was the dream. As electric dreams go, it was a pretty groovy one.
@MissConstrue @complexmath @nelson I don't think you necessarily need anything quantum for it, just some very powerful classical computational device (based on the fact that given our current understanding of the human brain, they do not do any quantum-like processing. also the fact that quantum computers have been "just a few years away" for what, like 30 years now?)
but yeah, I find AI in concept quite interesting. if you'd asked me pre-chatgpt, that's what I wanted to specialize into. now? god, that shit just sounds so fucking exhausting. I do not want anything to do with it. I want to stay as far away from it as possible.
@solonovamax @MissConstrue @complexmath @nelson I would not expect a large language model to be capable of doing so, no matter how advanced. An ‘AI’ ‘agent’ based on some other technology? Perhaps. But at that point we’re literally just saying ‘technically it’s not impossible for this to exist in future’; we’re in the realm of science fiction.
but yes, I currently believe that an artificial agent capable of thought and accurately modeling the world is science fiction however I believe it is possible, only based on the fact that the transformer architecture is turing complete. but it might not be efficient for this, it might require like a model that's 10,000x larger than what is currently the largest possible model. I do not believe it is something that is possible in the near future (well, I hope it isn't).
but yes, I currently believe that an artificial agent capable of thought and accurately modeling the world is science fiction however I believe it is possible, only based on the fact that the transformer architecture is turing complete. but it might not be efficient for this, it might require like a model that's 10,000x larger than what is currently the largest possible model. I do not believe it is something that is possible in the near future (well, I hope it isn't).
@nelson agents (the general word for entities performing actions to achieve their goal, not talking about necessarily "AI agents", this word even applies to people, and even something like a thermostat that controls temperature) that wish to achieve their goals should be able to accurately model the real world their ability to model the real world is directly correlated with their ability to achieve their goals. so, an agent which can accurately model the real world is able to achieve its goal much more easily that one that cannot accurately model the real world
and, people generally call an accurate model of the real world "truth"
hypothetically, the transformer architecture should be able to scale to human-level intelligence as it is turing-complete. so, how it was trained doesn't necessarily matter, it's just that it is not capable of modeling the real world, so it cannot evaluate the truthiness of a statement
@eestileib @solonovamax @MissConstrue @complexmath reminds me of how much brains actually suck as computers, real brains are full of noise, operate in non-linear scales and are mostly "single-threaded" even though every single neuron works somewhat independently
i think our first mistake was to mistake computation with consciousness
@nelson @solonovamax If you're at all interested in some of the historic discourse regarding this sort of technology, google John Searle's Chinese room argument.
@solonovamax yeah it's just good at knowing what the next word is, so it can string something mathematically coherent
kind of like how "ai art" tends to be extremely generic looking because it quite literally aims to pick the most average in its dataset for a specific prompt
my current take on using AI to "solve problems" or "do tasks":
1) AI is made to produce statistically average output, often making the process more complex if you care about quality
2) output can be completely false, often making the process more c…
It's just rolling linguistic dice, words bouncing around between probablistic paddles in a bigass pachinko matrix. It's not designed to vet facts. It's designed to regurgitate plausible spitwads that RESEMBLE facts. And the weights behind all those paddles and slots are tuned to whatever agenda the designers wish.
...And the designers serve planetwrecking technofascist war profiteers who party with people like Epstein.
Why would anyone ever trust it with so much as a goddamn casserole recipe??
This entry was edited (Saturday, May 30, 2026, 6:45 PM)
@nelson agents (the general word for entities performing actions to achieve their goal, not talking about necessarily "AI agents", this word even applies to people, and even something like a thermostat that controls temperature) that wish to achieve their goals should be able to accurately model the real world their ability to model the real world is directly correlated with their ability to achieve their goals. so, an agent which can accurately model the real world is able to achieve its goal much more easily that one that cannot accurately model the real world
and, people generally call an accurate model of the real world "truth"
hypothetically, the transformer architecture should be able to scale to human-level intelligence as it is turing-complete. so, how it was trained doesn't necessarily matter, it's just that it is not capable of modeling the real world, so it cannot evaluate the truthiness of a statement
@nelson for a theoretical super-intelligence that is extremely good at modeling the real world, the ability to say something that sounds convincing but is false would be extremely natural, as it would be able to accurately predict when it should lie to achieve its end goals. however, LLMs are not at all doing this. it just seems they can't model the real world, instead their model of the real world is inaccurate so they 'hallucinate' things, aka 'lie'
@solonovamax Exactly — IT DOESN’T THINK. It’s not a mind, but just a huge statistical matrix.
(And in top of that, don’t folks like this feel ashamed that their job has devolved to pleading with a mindless idiot genie, rather than writing deterministic code?)
@solonovamax I’m sure that there is genuine utility in LLMs and the newer approaches to AI in general. But too many people are being led astray by LLMs intentional appearance of mentality so that they interact with them as people, as having understanding. That is wrong and risks terrible errors in the final product.
@michaelgemar @solonovamax I'm trying to convert my suddenly boss obsessed with our overlords pushing AI down our throats to at least use AI not as process but to at least write crappy but deterministic code :(
I don't partake on the LLM stuff but they've already proved some degree of usefulness.
I don't think people in general would trust them with sensitive (health, well being) stuff but from what I hear, some people are very good at wielding it as a tool.
I don't know how my car works, I'd be a terrible mechanic and racer. Still, it's very handy tool for me to move around.
I am a safety engineer for safety-relevant and mission-critical systems. And it is disheartening to see safety professionals at international conferences present 2-page-long prompts, doing basically all this, but much more so, and expect their "spicy autocomplete machine" (@pluralistic) to create safety analyses this way. And always talking about the LLM as if it could think. And prompt it to show its internal steps and "reasoning", not understanding that it does no such thing. It just creates another string of words that sounds as if an intelligence were describing the inner workings. The upshot almost always is "It sucks, we have to check and correct everything. We love it. It is the future!" 🤡🤪
This is Glymur Falls, Iceland. Amazing hike and waterfall not too far from Reykjavik. You have to cross a river to get to the lookout, but it's pretty shallow and the hike is quite easy (and well worth it!).
From Glymur falls, I followed a 20km trail called Leggjabrjótur into Þingvellir National Park. This trail was a lot less muddy than the previous one, and just spectacular all around. I camped by Sandvatn Lake. It was below freezing at night, but my sleeping bag kept me warm and cozy 😊
Some exciting news from 2025, F-Droid was awarded $50,000 in funding from FLOSS fund, an initiative dedicated to supporting critical, impactful, and valuable...
"Object permanence": the ability to understand that things still exist, even if you can't see 'em. Kids acquire a thorough sense of object permanence by the age of two. But when it comes to technopolitics, object permanence eludes full-grown lawmakers. These motherfuckers would lose a game of peek-a-boo.
-
If you'd like an essay-formatted version of this thread to read/share, here's a link to it on pluralistic.net, my surveillance-free, ad-free, tracker-free blog:
Over and over again, politicians are warned about the ways that their pet policies will a) produce enormous collateral damage, and; b) be easily evaded by the people they're seeking to control, giving rise to a cascade of ever-more extreme measures. And yet, they swallow a spider to catch a fly and then act baffled and hurt when we tell them it's their own damn fault that they now have to swallow a bird to catch the spider:
The foreseeable and foreseen consequences of bad technopolicy are all around us, but in the eternal *now* of a politics utterly devoid of object permanence, no one is allowed to remember what happened the last time we did something stupid, *especially* not when we're on the verge of doing that same stupid thing again, *only worse*:
Technopolitics are defined by Bruce Schneier's "security syllogism," which goes, "Something must be done! There, I've done something." "Something" doesn't have to fix the problem, and "something" doesn't have to anticipate what will happen next. So long as "something" is done, the issue is resolved and the politician can chalk up a win.
This gives rise to some genuinely bizarre consensus hallucinations, in which we pretend that the reality decreed by policy matches up with *actual* reality. Take "streaming." There is no such thing as "streaming." A "stream" is just "a download that is transmitted to an application that doesn't have a 'Save As...' button":
Once you decree there is such a thing as a stream, you must bend heaven and earth to ensure that no "Save As..." buttons are added to the "streaming" program. You have to make it illegal to inspect code. To modify code. To report code defects. To index info about defects in code. To index info about mods. To link to indices that compile defects and mods. You have to swallow the fly, the spider, the bird, the cat, the dog, and the whole damned horse:
Then there's that perennial fave, "bans on working cryptography." To ban working cryptography, you have to outlaw free/open source software. You have to inspect every device that comes into your country. You have to erect a Great Firewall that blocks every site that might carry working cryptography.
You make it impossible to reliably update the software in pacemakers, anti-lock brakes and nuclear power plants, *and* you make it easy for identity thieves, foreign powers and corporate spies to raid your government, your corporations, and your households - and it *still* won't work!
The latest consensus hallucination to take over our political classes is "age verification," a thing that manifestly *does not exist*. You can't "verify the age" of an internet user - you can only attempt to attribute every byte that traverses the *entire* internet to affirmatively identified persons:
This comes at enormous cost. It is a gift to every future dictator, every identity thief, and every would-be sexual exploiter of children, who will have access to the hacked, leaked, and badly secured troves of data that this doomed effort produces.
Yes, *doomed*. Because even when it comes to kids, "age verification" is just a way of convincing young people to familiarize themselves with VPNs.
This was *entirely obvious* from the very *instant* that "age verification" was mooted, and yet policymakers pretended they couldn't hear the chorus of people who pointed it out. When cornered on the issue, they were affronted: "Can't you see that something must be done? How dare you attempt to stop me from doing *something*?"
And now, every single one of these chucklefucks is proposing bans on VPNs, from Utah:
They were warned that this would happen. We told them not to swallow that fly. Now we're telling them not to swallow whole *bucketloads* of spiders. I fully expect that next year, they'll be telling us that once they swallow this herd of horses, it will all be OK.
My next book is *The Reverse Centaur's Guide to Life After AI*, out next month. Pre-order it now, including as a DRM-free audiobook or ebook, at my Kickstarter, and help me continue to prove that DRM-free isn't just the *right* way to reach an audience, it's also the *best* way to reach them:
The VPN ban is the tell. "We just need age verification" was always one step from "we just need to know who's using VPNs," which is one step from "VPNs are for criminals." They're not hiding the roadmap anymore.
I believe "swallow the fly, the spider, the bird, the cat, the dog, and the whole damned horse" will be your new catchphrase. Try saying it fast. It has certain pacing to it.
Auf YouTube findest du die angesagtesten Videos und Tracks. Außerdem kannst du eigene Inhalte hochladen und mit Freunden oder gleich der ganzen Welt teilen.
The deep ocean is one of the world’s largest, most fragile, and most important ecosystems. We need a global moratorium to stop the launch of this destructive new extractive industry.
Seems easy to solve, but since our database is massive, around 80GB, it took around 20 hours to restore....
I understand that it totally sucks for a Social Network to be down for almost a day. People may be put off and not want to use Friendica anymore. Or our instance at least. But our instance has been very reliable for the past years and I always email people to tell them about updating it, so they are aware such things can happen.
Also, our budget for TROM.tf is around €0, compared to the billions floating around Facebook and the like. So please understand that.
Today we will give the update another try, and it is likely to work. If it doesn't at least thanks to @YunoHost a backup will be automatically restored.
No worries, some of us enjoy Friendica and TROM.tf for reasons that a day's worth of downtime couldn't sway. And I'd like to think there's more folk around here than just me who very much appreciate the hard work you and your team put in on our behalf. Plus, there's only one thing that could ever drag me away from this instance, and we all know I just can't be trusted to do the upkeep on one of my own.
@Tio @YunoHost Thanks for all you do. I hope the issue gets resolved soon, but fortunately, Friendica 2026.01 is already working wonderfully, and yours is one of the best instances out there, and certainly the most well-maintained English-language Friendica instance.
Regarding that upgrade failure - I ran this: sudo apt-get update --fix-missing with that key errors: Err:6 dl.yarnpkg.com/debian stable InRelease The following signatures couldn't be verified because the public key is not available: NO_PUBKEY 62D54FD4003F6525 Err:7 packages.sury.org/php bookworm InRelease The following signatures were invalid: EXPKEYSIG B188E2B695BD4743 DEB.SURY.ORG Automatic Signing Key <deb@sury.org>
Woke up to a suspended social media account with zero explanation? Arbitrary account suspensions or content takedowns are direct violations of your freedom of speech.
Report it to our 24/7 RightsLine for pro bono legal support to navigate the redressal mechanism, challenge these violations, and reach the right authorities.
“This is an important public service announcement related to your right to privacy … We the people have 1 day 16 hours 33 minutes 13 seconds to take action and influence this outcome. … For now, your encrypted messages have a lock on them.
Only you, and the person you're talking to, hold the key. Not the app. Not the company. Not the government. You probably don't think about it. That's the whole point — it just works.
Until, possibly, the end of this summer.
WHAT BILL C-22 WOULD DO
Every messaging app in Canada would be required to build a second key.”
Another effort to destroy end-to-end encryption, and thus your privacy, this time from Canada.
“This is an important public service announcement related to your right to privacy … We the people have 1 day 16 hours 33 minutes 13 seconds to take action and influence this outcome. … For now, your encrypted messages have a lock on them.
Only you, and the person you're talking to, hold the key. Not the app. Not the company. Not the government. You probably don't think about it. That's the whole point — it just works.
Until, possibly, the end of this summer.
WHAT BILL C-22 WOULD DO
Every messaging app in Canada would be required to build a second key.”
Another effort to destroy end-to-end encryption, and thus your privacy, this time from Canada.
Bill C-22 would force every messaging app in Canada to build a backdoor — and track all your activity for one year. Apple says no. Signal says they'll leave.
Another bill, masquerading as a "public service" initiative, is dismantling the last bastion of privacy. This second key isn't protection; it's an open invitation for anyone with the power or the ability to enter your digital life without permission. The future of digital freedoms in Canada is under threat🚨🚨 chuffed.org/project/177144
In the wake of a shattered home, I wake each day beside my wife and children, spread across what remains of our former life. Our roof collapsed, taking with it both shelter and the steady rhythm of daily work.
I fear this is spreading globally...at least europe and the uk, certainly the states.
Right wing paranoia - what do they imagine we are all talking about?
I'm in the uk, and I intend to replace my 'smart' phone with an old phone/burner - no internet - and getting a second hand laptop to install linux mint on.
I'm going off grid, even though I'm not a terrorist, and no danger to anyone...I just have political opinions.
Plus being a grumpy old git gives me licence to piss them off, lol!
Just read more about them retaining metadata for 12 months...I wonder where this will be stored - almost certainly one of these - AWS, google, microsoft.
All american corporations, and as a result that makes all that data available to american agencies under their data laws.
Perhaps this may be a way to shelve this Canadian plan? Bit late, I know, but only today I read about it ☹️.
#Heliboard is gathering gesture typing data, so that we can implement a #FOSS alternative to the closed gesture typing library Heliboard currently relies on. The data we collect will be released under the CC BY-SA 4.0
I also made a video including details & instructions.
Boosts Please! The greater the diversity of people & languages in the data, the better we can test for correctness.
Auf YouTube findest du die angesagtesten Videos und Tracks. Außerdem kannst du eigene Inhalte hochladen und mit Freunden oder gleich der ganzen Welt teilen.
I decided to ease into my hiking in Iceland adventure by doing a Workaway for the first month. I'm staying in a beautiful town called Akranes with a lovely Icelandic family. I'm working part time in exchange for accommodation and food, and I'm able to test my camping/hiking equipment on my days off. So far only my jacket and sleeping pad are a big failure 😁 The Hubba Hubba tent and phantom sleeping bag have held up in below freezing conditions, so that's a relief 😅 Here are some photos from my first week in Iceland.
@12thRITS when I first started going to Iceland, the reforestation programs were very young, as were the very few trees. They would tell this joke: “What do you do if you get lost in an Icelandic forest?” A: “Stand up!”
These days there are actual forests with really big trees (for the Arctic anyway)!
@Dima oh nice! What are you gonna do in Iceland? Unfortunately I'll have to leave at the end of June. Btw if you stay until August 12 you'll be able to see the total solar eclipse here. It would be pretty cool :D
hmm, then maybe I should be there on 12th August. I will join anti-whaling mission, they are planning to kill Fin whales this year in Iceland. So I will go for 2 weeks to volunteer, not sure when exactly yet.
Yeah, last two years they didn't but this summer they got permission again to kill 100+ Fin Whales, which are 2nd biggest mammals on planet . It's kind of with Sea Shepherd, the founder made his own organization "Paul Watson Foundation" so I will go with them
Our #peertube instance - videos.trom.tf - is not currently working. A failed upgrade and failed restore from backup. We need to figure what is the issue...stay tuned.
This is a disaster. Updating from 8.1.5 ynh2 to 8.1.6 ynh1. Log here https://paste.yunohost.org/raw/icomahipej 2026-05-23 11:52:54,574: DEBUG - + pushd /var/www/peertube 2026-05-23 11:52:54,574: DE...
Google is an Ad Company. So their incentive will always be to serve you ads, collect data. You are their customer. They do not simply make these tools to help you, and make it easier and more reliable to search for stuff. Ask yourself how will Google, and others, make money off of these "AI" tools now? It will be even more deceiving and sneaky.
In a sane society (not trade-based) these tools would be tested a lot. For accuracy, for what the outcome can be if billions of people use them, etc.. Did Google do that? I doubt.
If Google removes the search results and replaces it all with "AI" summaries and explanations, two things happen: Complete reliance on the biggest Ad Company for answering your search queries. And second, people will further drift apart from understanding that trust was a key factor in knowing if a source is valid or not. Like where is the info coming from. Now it will simply come from the AI God. Blackhole.
In theory to have access to a faster and more reliable way of finding informati
... Show more...
Ok. Here are the issues:
Google is an Ad Company. So their incentive will always be to serve you ads, collect data. You are their customer. They do not simply make these tools to help you, and make it easier and more reliable to search for stuff. Ask yourself how will Google, and others, make money off of these "AI" tools now? It will be even more deceiving and sneaky.
In a sane society (not trade-based) these tools would be tested a lot. For accuracy, for what the outcome can be if billions of people use them, etc.. Did Google do that? I doubt.
If Google removes the search results and replaces it all with "AI" summaries and explanations, two things happen: Complete reliance on the biggest Ad Company for answering your search queries. And second, people will further drift apart from understanding that trust was a key factor in knowing if a source is valid or not. Like where is the info coming from. Now it will simply come from the AI God. Blackhole.
In theory to have access to a faster and more reliable way of finding information is a must in a world that is saturated with information. BUT the way it is done now it will make rich people richer, and the consumers more "consuming".
It is simply a normal evolution of a trade-based society. As it is in the offline, it is in the online too.
Google is transforming Search from a list of links into an AI-powered experience filled with conversational answers, autonomous agents, and interactive interfaces — a shift that could further reduce traffic to publishers across the web.
BTW, I don't think Google is going to completely ditch their search results page, because the TechCrunch article said it like this:
> Instead of returning a simple list of links, Google Search will drop users into AI-powered interactive experiences at times.
I don't think "at times" at the end here was an accident. It is still very bad that Google is doing this, but I feel like if they removed the search results page entirely then there would be a big backlash.
What Google is trying to do now is to slowly get people accustomed to the "AI-powered interactive experience" and perhaps sometime in the future they would make it the default, reminds me of the boiling frog.....
They may not do it now, but may do it eventually. Plus if they push that interactive summary then most people will use that, just as today they use those simple summaries. So in a sense making the search results irrelevant.
What Google is trying to do now is to slowly get people accustomed to the "AI-powered interactive experience" and perhaps sometime in the future they would make it the default, reminds me of the boiling frog.....
XPHETOE
in reply to F-Droid • • •iooioio
in reply to F-Droid • • •iooioio
in reply to F-Droid • • •I tripped over this:
> Most of those things run on open source software
So not all the software powering F-Droid is open-source? Could you elaborate?