The FSF's Free System Distribution Guidelines are INSANE!
- YouTube
Auf YouTube findest du die angesagtesten Videos und Tracks. Außerdem kannst du eigene Inhalte hochladen und mit Freunden oder gleich der ganzen Welt teilen.www.youtube.com
TFed reshared this.
TFed likes this.
reshared this
haha, i also though like this at the beginning, though i thankfully didn't go down that road, but i also spaced out on a silly mistake returning 0 instead of the last value in a utility function…
At least part 2 was trivial from my part 1 solution.
Why It Was Almost Impossible to Make the Blue LED
youtube.com/watch?v=AF8d72mA41…
This man is the definition of determination, huge respect for the guy! 🙏
Why It Was Almost Impossible to Make the Blue LED
The blue LED was supposed to be impossible—until a young engineer proposed a moonshot idea. Head to https://brilliant.org/veritasium to start your free 30-da...YouTube
like this
reshared this
TROM II: The many ways we are destroying this planet
videos.trom.tf/w/w1jW1t8p7LXrA…
We all know that humans are wreaking havoc on the natural ecosystems of our planet, but it's astonishing to see the actual scale of it all. Go ahead and watch the TROM II documentary if you haven't yet, because it's full of such amazing facts about our world.
like this
reshared this
What Jumping Spiders Teach Us About Color - youtube.com/watch?v=nfAqTSjMBJ…
It's amazing to see the scientific process in action, from how we figured out ways to test the color vision of these spiders to what that teaches us about their evolution. Nature is full of mind blowing adaptations! 😍
What Jumping Spiders Teach Us About Color
How jumping spiders reveal an entire secret world of colors. Let BetterHelp connect you to a therapist who can support you - all from the comfort of your own...YouTube
like this
reshared this
Pendant que le Congrès US ovationnait Netanyahu, une manifestante israélienne dénonçait à Tel Aviv / Tal-Habbib la complicité des USA dans le génocide à Gaza.
___
While the US Congress gave Netanyahu a standing ovation, an Israeli demonstrator in Tel Aviv/Tal-Habbib denounced US complicity in the genocide in Gaza.
#Netanyahu #Israel #Genocide #USCongress
reshared this
🚀 The Future is Federated - issue no.6 👩🚀
The Future of Social is Here: a Show and Tell (part 1: #Mastodon ↔️ #Pixelfed )
blog.elenarossini.com/the-futu…
with shout-outs to @phanpy @tapbots @ivory @Tusky @dansup
✨ and special thanks to @evan @cwebber for your work on #ActivityPub, the magic protocol that is making all this possible ✨
#TheFutureIsFederated #tech #Fediverse #bigtech #socialmedia #FOSS #blog #RebelAlliance
The Future of Social is Here: a Show and Tell (part 1: Mastodon ↔️ Pixelfed)
The secret ingredient of the Fediverse is the ActivityPub protocol and how it allows networks to talk to each other. See the magic in action!Elena Rossini
reshared this
#TFG & Republicans are existential threats to Americans & the world.
#BidenHarris2024 #VoteBlueDownBallot #ClimateCrisis #ClimateEmergency #GlobalWarming #FossilFuels
TFed likes this.
reshared this
A bit of redesign of my website - tiotrom.com/
Didn't check on mobile. Will tweak it for mobile later.
like this
reshared this
If anyone thinks that China is a "communist" society, just watch this documentary - videoneat.com/documentaries/26…
They are as "capitalistic" as USA. Or, in other words, they have a trade-based society. As simple as that. Produce, trade, consume.
#trade #china #usa #communism #capitalism #money #consumption
like this
reshared this
"They are as "capitalistic" as USA. Or, in other words, they have a trade-based society. As simple as that. Produce, trade, consume."
That is not what capitalism is. China is functionally capitalist to a degree, yes, but not because they have production and trade and consumption. It's because many of the means of production are held privately, and to a degree they have the capacity to buy and sell as they wish.
Well the truth is that capitalism, socialism, or other isms are vague ideals.
The means of production being privately owned means near to nothing since they are always under the weight of a gov. USA or China. You can't just own a business, meaning be able to trade as an individual under your own rules. You are always restrained and directed by gov, laws, rules, regions.
In essence what we have globally is a society of trade, where trade is the main activity and drive. China, USA, Europe, whatever hey call themselves as communist, free markets, socialist, capitalist, in the end is all about a trade-based society.
I wrote a book about it all if anyone is interested - tromsite.com/books/#flipbook-t…
Private companies, if big enough, will be bailed out by the gov. See SpaceX, Tesla, and more. The gov will also intervene to stop monopolies from creating, at least in theory. They split apart the largest telecommunication company in the USA not long ago. So gov is intervening, from capping the prices of drugs, providing subsidies, tweaking taxes, etc..
China, USA, Europe or the rest. The gov is always intervening.
For another, if the government owns the means of production, you have a monopoly; such a thing is barely possible under free market capitalism.
A...sorry what? Microsoft, Apple, Facebook, Google ?? We live in a world of monopolies. In another book I wrote I showcase that in detail tromsite.com/books/#flipbook-t…
Private companies, if big enough, are sometimes bailed out; I agree. They should not be. That is cronyism, not capitalism. They should be allowed to fail, and indeed sometimes are.
As to monopolies, nearly all of them are enabled by government action, not stopped by it.
Tell me; what does google have a monopoly in? Putting aside, of course, that we absolutely don't live under free market capitalism.
But they are....I am talking about the real world we live in not idealistic concepts. I compare USA with China and their self imposed labels, not the official and mushy definitions of capitalism vs communism since these do not exist.
As to monopolies, nearly all of them are enabled by government action, not stopped by it.
They are enabled by a system of trade that incentivizes companies to grow and individuals to seek profit.
Tell me; what does google have a monopoly in?
Too many things. Mobile operating systems, search engine, browser, online videos, online advertising, etc.. Again see here tromsite.com/books/#flipbook-t… - I spent a year on this book.
Yes, they are..sometimes. Which still leaves plenty of small companies and some large ones that are allowed to fail; that is a good thing.
LIFE incentivizes individuals to profit from their action. That's true under all economic systems.
Nope; there's iOs/sailfish/Ubuntu touch, duckduckgo/yahoo/ask/dogpile/plenty more, firefox/opera/safari/chrome, peertube and odyssey, plenty of other ad companies.
So, again, what does google have a monopoly in?
Those you mention are barely "competitors". Google owns the market of mobile operating systems (over 70%), search prob over 90%, video platform, browser, etc.. They even give Firefox a ton of money to keep google as the default search engine. Basically google has no competition in many areas.
LIFE incentivizes individuals to profit from their action.
The environment pushes people to become one way or another. Currently we live in a trade-based society that incentivizes people to profit, compete, be selfish. etc..
Those I mention are competitors. They exist, plenty of people can and do use them, and therefore google does not have a monopoly.
Yes, environments shape people. Please, provide literally any example of an environment where an individual is not incentivized to profit from their action.
Yah those are as much competitors as I am for Usain Bolt. I mean I can run...but have no chance to ever win a race with Usain. Same for Firefox and the like.
Please, provide literally any example of an environment where an individual is not incentivized to profit from their action.
Sure. We have a directory of such organizations where people volunteer without making any profits directory.trade-free.org/
Poor comparison. No one imagines you can run anywhere near as fast as him,. PLENTY of people use the products and services of other companies, me included.
Oh, I see the issue here. You're restricting yourself to MONETARY profit. Here you go: merriam-webster.com/dictionary…
No one imagines Firefox will overthrown Chrome or Linux Microsoft...these are clear examples of monopolies.
By not making a profit I mean they do not ask anything in return. They just do/help. Good people.
It's irrelevant whether anyone imagines that anyone else will "overthrow" chrome or anyone else. Here:
merriam-webster.com/dictionary…
As to "not making a profit', do you imagine that do not see a valuable return for what they do?
"If no one can compete with google in some domains"
Such is not the case. I challenge you to name me a single domain in which no one, NO ONE, offers a plausible and functional alternative to google.
Please. You linked to en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Free_mar…, which in the SECOND SENTENCE says "Such markets, as modeled, operate without the intervention of government", and then went on to nonsense like social.trom.tf/display/dbc8dc4…
Seriously?
"Such markets, as modeled, operate without the intervention of government"
"And partially it is present since big companies control governments"
Do you actually not see the contradiction here?
Sorry to be rude but I'll never drop you anything. I hope you can find other things on the fediverse.
And no one can pay for my books since they are free. And they are books not "books", I think you may not understand the use of quotes.
I hope we can say goodby now and you go on your way :)
"And partially it is present since big companies control governments in many cases giving them a "free" hand at doing business."
Then you fail entirely to understand what a free market even is.
There absolutely is such a thing as a free market. For example; who regulates who is and is not allowed to make, buy, or sell backpacks in the US?
As to your complaints about things like greed; tell me, are YOU greedy?
No one "markets" "freely". There are regulations in place. Even for backpacks.
And mostly no I am not greedy but it depends on what situations I face. Look at what I've been doing for the past 15 years tiotrom.com/projects/ - all free. Never made a profit. So likely I am not greedy most of the time.
Please, show me the regulations on who can buy, sell, and/or make backpacks in the US.
Really? You're not greedy? It's rare to meet someone willing to make such a claim. What a saint you must be.
Of course you need to have a license for producing such a thing, patents, pay taxes, and a license to sell and where to. If you start to make backpacks now and sell them on the street you may be fined. You are also forced to pay taxes for your business and more.
Really? You're not greedy? It's rare to meet someone willing to make such a claim. What a saint you must be.
I said probably most of the time I am not. I released 2 huge documentaries, published over 30 books, made videos, articles, run trom.tf (free services for everyone), tromjaro.com linux distro, and more. All trade-free. Not a saint, but prob not greedy either.
No, no, no claims. Please link me to actual regulations that say you need, for example, a license to produce backpacks.
No, no, don't sell yourself short. If you're not greedy, don;' engage in false modesty. Just admit you're not greedy.
The most frustrating thing in any software: Spell checking. I don't want it, I don't need it - why do folks force it and have no way to disable it? (Electron, looking at you)
The worst are the AppImages for Linux for apps where typing is a necessity and as I use multiple languages the spell checker is definitely not wanted. When there are no way to disable it, I often need to write my own software wrapper for those apps. FML.
reshared this
In #manuskript we have modular spellchecking. It can be turned off or the language can be switched easily. You can also add words to personal lists to be ignored.
Not all software needs to be annoying. Pick #FOSS to have the choice to fix it.
Alex Zandra
in reply to mcc • • •mcc
in reply to Alex Zandra • • •@zandra I did not watch the video yet but I assume they mean "that we know of". youtube.com/watch?v=eMtBmF7izg…
There's lots of reasons to believe an *earth-like* planet should be pretty rare. However exoplanets themselves are very common and we have only observed a relatively small number of them, so us finding nothing earthlike doesn't mean earth is literally unique. There is also an effect where most of the early exoplanets we detected were gas giants (because they are easier to detect).
- YouTube
www.youtube.comAlex Zandra
in reply to mcc • • •oh interesting!
oh, to make friends with gas giant dwellers
mkj
in reply to Alex Zandra • • •@zandra I certainly wouldn't rule out the possibility of a moon of a gas giant being habitable; definitely as long as by habitable we are willing to settle for "capable of supporting *any* kind of life at all".
Imagine something like Titan, just orbiting a planet closer to its host star (relative to the luminosity of the host star); or Venus farther out. That doesn't seem *all* that far-fetched, but it would probably be very hard to detect, let alone prove active biological processes on.
@mcc
mcc
in reply to mkj • • •Leon ._.
in reply to Alex Zandra • • •Graham
in reply to mcc • • •Dźwiedziu
in reply to mcc • • •Nocta on fibre
in reply to mcc • • •How is "too big" a problem?
Damn you fucking youtube video thumbnails that bend the truth a bit and retain information just so that you're uncomfortable enough to want to click on the video to calm you down :(
mcc
in reply to Nocta on fibre • • •Nocta on fibre
in reply to mcc • • •mcc
in reply to Nocta on fibre • • •Morten Grøftehauge
in reply to mcc • • •mcc
in reply to Morten Grøftehauge • • •