The media in this post is not displayed to visitors. To view it, please log in.
We made a video of the top 6 places we visited in Spain with our motorhome-
videos.trom.tf/w/iuFvWGXte95Ne…
1. Picos de Europa National Park
2. The Cave of Nerja
3. Bardenas Reales
4. El Caminito del Rey
5. Aguila Cave
6. Mirador de Masatrigo
Spain is a lot more diverse than many people imagine!
... Show more...We made a video of the top 6 places we visited in Spain with our motorhome-
videos.trom.tf/w/iuFvWGXte95Ne…
1. Picos de Europa National Park
2. The Cave of Nerja
3. Bardenas Reales
4. El Caminito del Rey
5. Aguila Cave
6. Mirador de Masatrigo
Spain is a lot more diverse than many people imagine!
#spain #travel #vanlife #nature #nationalparks #mountains #Cave
TOP 6 Places we visited in Spain with the motorhome!
We discovered so many amazing nature places in Spain: caves, mountains, lakes, or deserts. We avoid being motorhome-tourists, following the same path as most people with motorhomes do. We avoid big cities and crowded places and often find nature places by simply exploring digital maps to find hidden gems.
That being said these 6 places could be very different from that most people would recommend you when traveling to Spain with a motorhome:
- 00:27 Mirador de Masatrigo
- 02:10 Aguila Cave
- 04:19 Caminito del Rey
- 06:17 Bardenas Reales
- 09:10 Nerja Cave
- 11:53 Picos de Europa
Misuse Case
in reply to evacide • • •David Penfold
in reply to evacide • • •Toni Aittoniemi
in reply to evacide • • •Demosthenes 🛶🐈🐈☕️
in reply to evacide • • •evacide
in reply to Demosthenes 🛶🐈🐈☕️ • • •ℂ𝕖𝕝𝕖𝕤𝕥𝕖@world: /#
in reply to evacide • • •🅰🅻🅸🅲🅴 (🌈🦄)
in reply to evacide • • •"""
Persona’s exposed code compares your selfie to watchlist photos using facial recognition, screens you against 14 categories of adverse media from mentions of terrorism to espionage, and tags reports with codenames from active intelligence programs consisting of public-private partnerships to combat online child exploitative material, cannabis trafficking, fentanyl trafficking, romance fraud, money laundering, and illegal wildlife trade.
Once a user verifies their identity with Persona, the software performs 269 distinct verification checks and scours the internet and government sources for potential matches...
"""
So to keep kids safe from online predators, we're willing to *horribly* invade their privacy and sell all their data to predators? I see the system is working as intended 😮💨
reshared this
Quixoticgeek, aliceice, KB, diana 🏳️⚧️🦋🌱 and Hex reshared this.
Clem
in reply to 🅰🅻🅸🅲🅴 (🌈🦄) • • •@alice i juste read and article by @Ivovanwilligen about persona and if he doesn't know about all this well now he does !
His article : thelocalstack.eu/posts/linkedi…
Momo
in reply to 🅰🅻🅸🅲🅴 (🌈🦄) • • •...and I'm pretty sure, if your name and picture is on the right list, your location will be hit by a hellfire missile fired from a reaper drone after you performed mandatory age verification. America! Fuck, yeah!
@evacide
Zappes
in reply to 🅰🅻🅸🅲🅴 (🌈🦄) • • •Wuzzy
in reply to evacide • • •Ah yes, "let us protect children by scanning their faces". What could possibly be wrong??? 🤡
“the software ‘flags you as a “suspicious entity” based on your face alone’ …”
Yay! Phrenology 2.0!
Nonya Bidniss
in reply to evacide • • •💀 𝓕airchild 💀
in reply to evacide • • •And if we do it won't be that bad
And if it was, at least it's secure
And if it' not we didn't mean it
And if we did you deserved it
Scott Williams 🐧
in reply to evacide • • •Ollie Boermans
in reply to evacide • • •and meanwhile the Australian government is claiming credit for protecting children by standing up to social media companies to force them to use this kind of tech.
I’m sure the pressure is in the opposite direction.
Gerard
in reply to Ollie Boermans • • •@ollicle Yep. It's brilliant from a certain perspective. Horrifying, sinister, but with a certain genius.
The tech firms get to say "Oh, no, the horrible government is making us do this. Oh well. Now give us your identity documents."
The governments get to give the appearance of responding to (genuinely) grieving parents, and say "we're protecting the children" which is game over for any alternative voice. All the while receiving funding (directly or indirectly) from the tech firms that created the problem or the supposed solution, or their fellow travellers.
And parents get to believe their children's safety is taken care of.
Erin Church 🏳️⚧️
in reply to evacide • • •This level of centralisation of data is so so dangerous. Putting all our eggs in one basket digitally makes for a very inviting target, but this sort of infrastructure also concentrates power.
Knowledge is power, and this level of control can easily calcify our political systems and eat away at democracy.
Claudius Link
in reply to evacide • • •mastodon.social/@bsletten/1161…
Brian Sletten (@bsletten@mastodon.social)
Brian Sletten (Mastodon)Don Urcu
in reply to evacide • • •Tero Hänninen
in reply to evacide • • •Neil
in reply to evacide • • •if something is free, never forget to ask who pays for it, who benefits?
I personally think it's great, though, that there are also people striving _for_ a better internet. That gives me hope. 🙂
me·ta·phil, der
in reply to evacide • • •Katika Kühnreich
in reply to evacide • • •One of the many reasons to be against #ageverification software
It gives the wrong people & companies tons of data, often #biometric ones
Therefore we transfers #power exactly the wrong people & #corporations
And as we can know latest since #Edwardsnowden companies do share data with governments
The cornerstone of the #chinese #surveillance #state is #realnameregistration
Don't give #biometrics to #evilcorp, especially not for cheap thrills
Do not hand data to #fascists
#resist
Jeff McNeill
in reply to evacide • • •F3715H
in reply to evacide • • •just don't use #discord and refuse to #ID as a matter of principle!
infosec.space/@kkarhan/1161142…
Kevin Karhan :verified: (@kkarhan@infosec.space)
Kevin Karhan :verified: (Infosec.Space)diana 🏳️⚧️🦋🌱
in reply to evacide • • •Bastian
in reply to evacide • • •@evacide
Travis F W
in reply to evacide • • •