My laptop journey: Dell Inspirion 7620 2 in 1
I got a refund for the Slimbook Executive 16 that I sent back. Although they refused to pay for the transport which, form what I read online, should have been covered by the refund. It was around 20 euros in total and I didn't want to "debate" over it anyway. They were generally nice over email and I also removed their stickers from the laptop and perhaps I should not have done that. So it is ok.
Am happy that I returned it because I want to test other laptops. Now I am convinced I will order (to test) the Dell Inspirion 7620 2 in 1:
It has a 16inch screen at 16:10, something I fully love.
I has a good keyboard it seems with no nonsense numpad:
It is very well built I've heard. Fully aluminium. A bit heavy at 2kg, but because it is really sturdy I'v read. My laptop is 3kg....and shitty built :D
It is also a convertible and has a touch screen + fingerprint reader:
Not that I'd use these much, but it is a nice bonus considering that I tweak TROMjaro for touchscreens too, and now I can directly test it on my machine and not rely on the old tablet that we have. I would also love to add a proper fingerprint reader support to TROMjaro, so now I can test it.
As for the internals, I will go for the i7-1260P CPU and perhaps the MX550 Nvidia GPU combo. Not as powerful as the Slimbook, but a lot more than my current laptop. The advantage is that this combo consumes a lot less power than what Slimbook had under the hood. Which means much better battery life (they say it lasts all day) + a much slimmer and usb-c power adapter that you can buy for like 20 Euros from any tech-store if you need to replace it.
So in a way although the Slimbook is half a kilo lighter, its charger is massive so....this Dell with such a small charger despite being heavier I would like it to be like that.
Another cool thing about this laptop is that it has dual channel RAM slots that you can upgrade. For a 2 in 1 this is quite unique. They say max 32GB in total, but I've heard you can put 64GB and I will try that. As for storage unfortunately it only has 1 m2 slot and they say that it supports up to 2TB, but again I've heard you can add up to 4TB. I will compromise to 2TB of storage if this laptop is as good as I read it is, but 4TB would be perfect for me....will have to try and see.
Actually the entire laptop seems quite easy to fix and upgrade:
And being a bit popular you can already find components despite being released just a few months ago. They have a detailed manual about how you can replace and upgrade parts.
Speaking of that, the awesome Framework 13.5inch laptop that is marketed as very repairable (and it is) clocks at around 1.400 Euros with the same CPU and no GPU. This Dell clocks around 1.300 Euros new via ebay and around 1k second hand via the same ebay. So it is much cheaper overall, seems very durable, much larger screen, yet still relatively easy to repair/upgrade.
Oh and I've read that the speakers on this Dell, 4 of which, are one of the best out there. Same goes for the webcam that even has a camera shutter for privacy.
Overall the laptop (in theory from what I read and see) seems quite slim, very robust, very powerful, decently upgradable and repairable, amazing screen, good keyboard, great speakers and good webcam, great battery life. At least in theory, let's see in practice.
I will likely buy it second hand since this laptop is a very new model and so second hand units should be barely used. Getting it much cheaper allows me to buy a 4TB m2 and even some 64GB of RAM, if the laptop can handle all of that.
For now I will continue with the work on TROM II but I plan in February or so to order it and test.
Massive thanks to Roma and the few others who donated for my laptop campaign. Basically Roma made this possible.
The laptop is my sole enabler of everything you see TROM-made. Websites, video editing, TROMjaro and all of that. Therefore it is the most important piece of technology in my life, and thus I want to choose with care. Basically I would love to just have 1 laptop and that's all.
Anyway, I am sharing these in case it helps others too.

Tio
in reply to Tio • •like this
Alexio and Rokosun like this.
Rokosun reshared this.
Rokosun
in reply to Tio • •@Tio
Yeah, Luke smith might say some stupid things at times, but he's good at teaching you about linux, I've learned a lot from him. I totally understand why some admins don't want his videos showing up on their instance, and AFAIK you can prevent that in peertube, but if a user manually searches for the channel and decides to subscribe then you shouldn't interfere and block them. At the end of the day, the whole point of fedi is that you could follow anyone from any instance, if that feature is broken then fedi is just like any other social media.
Also, in my opinion, if admins block out all the right wing instances then all that does is to make sure that these people never get exposed to any left wing ideas and change their views. You cannot make any kind of social change without interacting with people who disagree with you, or else you're just preaching to the choir.
like this
Mark and Tio like this.
reshared this
Mark and Rokosun reshared this.
Tio
in reply to Rokosun • •Yeah it is easy to make your peertube only show the videos you want, from the instances you follow and such. Even disable the global search so people can't even search for any other videos but the ones that you have locally. So you have total control. But if I am a user on your instance and wanna subscribe to luke-the-right-wing-guy, you should not interfere with that. Because if you do, as admin, then you become a curator of what people should or should not watch. Plus you ruin the idea behind the fediverse.
But it seems people are not thinking long term at all over here....
Rokosun likes this.
Rokosun
in reply to Tio • •Actually I know there are some people who's thinking about the long term consequences of defederation and is trying to find a solution to this problem. I haven't looked much into it but they're working on this project ufoi.org/ which aims to form a community of instances that agree to federate with each other, its not perfect but its much better than the current way of doing things which is not very transparent. FYI, this is not like a closed off group, they promote openness and decentralization, you'll get the gist once you take a look at what they're proposing. I first heard about this project from @admitsWrongIfProven and @๐ Dr. Freemo :jpf: ๐ณ๐ฑ, they seem to be very open minded and transparent about everything which I really appreciate.
like this
MZan and ham honey like this.
๐ Doc Freemo ๐ณ๐ฑ reshared this.
Tio
in reply to Rokosun • •๐ Doc Freemo ๐ณ๐ฑ
Unknown parent • • •As you point out the issue isnt about defederation at all, its about the gossip, manipulation, and lies that results in uninformed defederation.
You pointed out one example already, where a group of people with the clear intent to spread rumors without any evidence were able to get QOTO removed from the official list, but it goes much deeper than that. That same misinformation has gotten quite a few servers defamed for things that never happened.
The reason, among other things, is that when an instance hears a rumor they defederate and stic those rumors in the "Reasons" column with no transparency or evidence, others pick up on this, rinse repeat. They have used some pretty nasty tactics to make this more prolific too. For example they have hordes of single user instances that defederate then maintain lists that list instances based on how many instances defederate them. So they are able to say "look this instance is in the top 10 most defederated" but leave out the fact that they are counting single user instances and in fact they arent really very defederated at all.
... Show more...As you point out the issue isnt about defederation at all, its about the gossip, manipulation, and lies that results in uninformed defederation.
You pointed out one example already, where a group of people with the clear intent to spread rumors without any evidence were able to get QOTO removed from the official list, but it goes much deeper than that. That same misinformation has gotten quite a few servers defamed for things that never happened.
The reason, among other things, is that when an instance hears a rumor they defederate and stic those rumors in the "Reasons" column with no transparency or evidence, others pick up on this, rinse repeat. They have used some pretty nasty tactics to make this more prolific too. For example they have hordes of single user instances that defederate then maintain lists that list instances based on how many instances defederate them. So they are able to say "look this instance is in the top 10 most defederated" but leave out the fact that they are counting single user instances and in fact they arent really very defederated at all.
What is needed less than the collaboration between instances the UFoI provides is the **transparency** on why defederation takes place with evidence and a chance for the other side to speak their piece. This way defederation can be informed.
Rokosun likes this.
Rokosun
in reply to ๐ Doc Freemo ๐ณ๐ฑ • •@๐ Dr. Freemo :jpf: ๐ณ๐ฑ @Tio @admitsWrongIfProven
Say if I joined an instance and my friend joined another, if one of our instances block the other then we can't communicate anymore, this is a big problem with defederation. I can of course ask my friends to join the same instance I'm on, but this will lead to centralization which is bad for fedi. This is where #UFoI comes in, its a group of instances that I know for sure will be federated with each other, so I can just ask my friends to join one of the instances listed there.
And the transparency bit is something I really appreciate, I know there are some bad actors on fedi that engage in slandering and false accusations without any evidence backing their claims, so I hope #UFoI can solve these issues.
like this
๐ Doc Freemo ๐ณ๐ฑ, Michael Piotrowski, minfu and JayTeeExcell like this.
reshared this
๐ Doc Freemo ๐ณ๐ฑ and Post reshared this.
๐ Doc Freemo ๐ณ๐ฑ
in reply to Rokosun • • •Yea, without UFoI the only way you can garuntee you and your friends all communicate is if you all join free speech servers (servers that dont defederate from anyone).
The nice thing about UFoI is it solves the problem while still allowing instance admins to defederate from bad actors.
@tio @admitsWrongIfProven
Rokosun likes this.
Rokosun
in reply to ๐ Doc Freemo ๐ณ๐ฑ • •@๐ Dr. Freemo :jpf: ๐ณ๐ฑ @Tio @admitsWrongIfProven
From what I understand, #UFoI doesn't say anything about how an instance should defederate and it is left up to the individual instances to decide for themselves, just that they should keep the federation open for other #UFoI members, right?
Mark likes this.
๐ Doc Freemo ๐ณ๐ฑ
in reply to Rokosun • • •Thats more or less accurate. Outside of the UFoI instances can choose how they federate. Inside the UFoI they should federate.
If an instance in the UFoI shows itself to be a bad actor and worthy of defederation then there is a transparent process centered around due process that is used to eject a bad actor instance from the UFoI at which point its members can decide to defederate if they wish to.
@tio @admitsWrongIfProven
Rokosun likes this.
Rokosun
in reply to ๐ Doc Freemo ๐ณ๐ฑ • •@๐ Dr. Freemo :jpf: ๐ณ๐ฑ @Tio @admitsWrongIfProven
Yeah, so far this sounds like a much better approach than the current way of doing things which is not transparent at all.
๐ Doc Freemo ๐ณ๐ฑ
in reply to Rokosun • • •Let your instance admin know your opinion and see if he might consider joining then.
@tio @admitsWrongIfProven
Rokosun likes this.
Soy_Magnus
in reply to ๐ Doc Freemo ๐ณ๐ฑ • • •Tio
in reply to Rokosun • •Wait until your instance from that select group may not be on par with the rest and they kick you out. I don't like when they make these little groups of friends. This is entirely different from what I first thought the fediverse is. The fact that you have to create such groups tells me that the fediverse is a bunch of facebooks and twitters and they use their power (many times the user count) to bully the other small instances. The fediverse should have been about a protocol that allows any instance to communicate with any other. The moment instances stop federating with other instances, this protocol is censored, broken, incomplete, nontransparent. And a mess in general.
like this
Mark, ๐ Doc Freemo ๐ณ๐ฑ and Rokosun like this.
Rokosun
in reply to Tio • •@Tio @๐ Dr. Freemo :jpf: ๐ณ๐ฑ @admitsWrongIfProven
I know, I'm now realizing that fediverse is not decentralized enough to make a real difference. We're now talking about instance admins fighting each other over disagreements, but wait until corporations begin to pour money into it and create instances of their own, that's when this power difference becomes obvious and by then it'll be too late.
Once a better p2p social network becomes viable then I'll be among the first to jump ship, we need to put power back in the hands of individual users, not a small number of admins or corporate entities who're capable of running massive servers.
Tio likes this.